International Pediatric Otolaryngology Group ( <scp>IPOG</scp> ) Consensus on Vestibular Testing in Children
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To date, there are no clear guidelines in the literature on protocols for pediatric vestibular testing, and approaches may differ between teams. The objective of this study was to establish a consensus guideline for the minimum pediatric vestibular tests that should be conducted in both expert and non-expert centers. METHODS: The leadership group identified 21 international experts in the pediatric vestibular field to participate. A modified Delphi process conducted over three rounds was employed to quantify consensus based on expert opinion. Consensus was considered achieved when over 80% of the participants agreed on a given proposition. RESULTS: For a non-expert team wishing to develop a pediatric vestibular protocol and irrespective of the child's age, 17 respondents (81%) agreed that the minimal vestibular testing should include lateral canal vHIT with remote camera (and/or rotary chair) and bone conduction cervical VEMPs. The same tests were selected by 17 respondents (81%) for testing 1-year-old children with an expert team. For an expert team testing a 4-year-old child, 17 respondents (81%) agreed that the minimal testing should include vHIT in all canals, cervical and ocular VEMPs using bone or air conduction, and rotary chair. No consensus emerged for the testing of eight-year-old children. CONCLUSION: This international consensus aims to help both expert and non-expert teams conduct more comparable age-dependent vestibular test protocols in children, fostering collaboration and establishing minimal standards for new teams. The key vestibular tests for children seem to be vHIT (and/or rotary chair) and cVEMP in bone conduction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".