MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410404804 · doi:10.17520/biods.2024585

The functions and challenges of grass-roots local governments in fulfilling the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework—A comparative analysis with the objectives of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change

2025· article· en· W4410404804 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jingjing Gu, Yizhuo Liu, Yang Su

Bibliographic record

VenueBiodiversity Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRegional Development and Environment
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsBiodiversityConvention on Biological DiversityClimate changeEnvironmental resource managementUnited Nations Framework Convention on Climate ChangeConventionEnvironmental planningGeographyPolitical scienceEnvironmental protectionEcologyKyoto ProtocolBiologyEnvironmental science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Backgrounds: To achieve the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (KMGBF) within the Chinese context, grass-roots local government are key players, as they implement or oversee most actionable measures.China's system excels at mobilizing collective efforts for national tasks like biodiversity management and climate change response.Challenges: Nevertheless, in the execution of top-down directives, grass-roots local government are inclined to prioritize and exhaustively implement initiatives that are tied to performance evaluation metrics.The comparative •保护与治理对策• 昆蒙框架如何在中国体制下成为主流工作目标专题 顾婧婧等: 基层地方政府在完成《昆蒙框架》中的作用和难点: 基于《联合国气候变化框架公约》任务的比较 2025年

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.129
Threshold uncertainty score0.257

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.006
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiodiversity ScienceSame topicRegional Development and EnvironmentFrench-language works237,207