MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

NEW–ONSET RIGHT BUNDLE BRANCH BLOCK AND TRANSIENT ST–SEGMENT ELEVATION INDUCED BY TRANSCUTANEOUS AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION: A DISTINCT ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC AND CLINICAL CASE. KEY WORDS: LMCA OCCLUSION, TAVI, RIGHT BUNDLE BRANCH BLOCK

2025· article· en· W4410405372 on OpenAlexaff
L Varotto, Alberto Dotto, S Maisenti, André Luís da Silva Fábris, Luca Spigolon, Paolo Vincenzi, Carlo Bonanno

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal Supplements · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsSurgical Specialties (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRight bundle branch blockCardiologyInternal medicineBundle branch blockLeft bundle branch blockAortic valveElectrocardiographyHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The occurrence of left bundle branch block (LBBB) during transcutaneous aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has an incidence of 5 to 65% and is due to mechanical damage to the conduction system, while the right bundle branch block (RBBB) or left posterior hemiblock (LPH) are very rare and associated with myocardial ischemia. The right bundle branch receives its blood supply from anterior descending coronary artery. Acute left main coronary artery (LMCA) occlusion during TAVI is a life–threatening complication, with an incidence of 0.6% but a 30–day mortality rate of up to 50%. The most likely mechanism is the obstruction by the native aortic valve (AV) leaflet. However, acute LMCA occlusion due to calcific plaque shifting has been rarely reported. Case presentation A 71–year–old woman presented to our department with acute heart failure. Electrocardiography (ECG) showed sinus rhythm; transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) revealed severe AV stenosis (AV area 0.62 cm2) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 46%. Coronary angiogram was normal. Computed tomography showed an aortic annulus size of 26/20 mm, sinus of Valsalva size of 33 mm, annulus area of 442 mm2, heavily calcified leaflets, height of LMCA 11 mm, and right coronary artery of 12 mm. Despite an intermediate–risk (STS–PROM 5%, EuroSCORE II 9.1%), the informed patient insisted on a TAVI treatment. The procedure was performed under deep sedation with the implantation of a 26 mm balloon–expandable valve, with good results. For the immediate appearance of RBBB/LPH and subsequent evidence of diffuse ST segment depression on the ECG, an angiogram was performed with evidence of obstruction of the LMCA (Fig. 1). Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to the LMCA was performed with one drug–eluting stent. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) demonstrated underexpansion of the stent, which was not responsive to high–pressure non–compliant balloon dilatation. Therefore, we deployed a stent–in–stent, with better expansion (Fig. 2). Following PCI, the ECG immediately returned to normal, with RBBB/LPH disappearing (Fig. 3).The patient was discharged on Day 3. At 6 weeks follow–up, TTE demonstrated normal LVEF and AV function. Conclusions Acute LMCA occlusion is a rare life–threatening complication of TAVI that is poorly predictable and requires immediate diagnosis/treatment. RBBB/LPH is an ominous sign, and the good old “ECG” with knowledges of anatomy/physiology can save the patient‘s life.Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart Journal SupplementsSame topicCardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207