MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410410552 · doi:10.1061/9780784486184.109

The Impact of Leaf Litter on the Performance of Catch Basin Inlets

2025· article· en· W4410410552 on OpenAlexaffabout
L.J. Poirier, AMANJ RAHMAN, Bert van Duin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicUrban Stormwater Management Solutions
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInletStructural basinLitterEnvironmental scienceMarine engineeringHydrology (agriculture)GeologyOceanographyEcologyEngineeringBiologyGeotechnical engineeringGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A full-scale model roadway was constructed at the Ocean, Coastal and River Engineering Research Centre of the National Research Council Canada (NRC-OCRE) in Ottawa, Canada, to measure the conveyance capacity of catch basin inlets. A total of 178 tests were performed with the primary goal of measuring the impact of leaf litter on conveyance in both ponding and flow through conditions. The inlet studied was a rectangular inlet design that is surface mounted and follows the profile of a 10 cm high rolled curb which was used in the study. Incident water depths ranging from 0.002 to 0.366 m were examined and the model roadway was tested in various orientations in flow through conditions with a 2.0% cross-slope and road grades ranging from 0.5% to 5.0%. The maximum flow reduction observed in the study was for the ponding or sag tests where the initial leaf litter obstructing approximately 95% of the inlet resulted in a conveyance which was only 35% of the unobstructed value. This work aims to assist municipalities in understanding the performance of their storm water management systems and inform where limited infrastructure funds should be allocated in order to adapt to increasingly severe urban flooding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUrban Stormwater Management SolutionsFrench-language works237,207