Redefinisi Perancah : Potensi Arsitektur Temporer pada Keberlanjutan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study explores the potential of scaffolding-based temporary architectural design within the framework of sustainable architecture. Traditionally utilized as a temporary structural element to facilitate construction processes, scaffolding has increasingly evolved into a central component in spatial formation across diverse design contexts. Employing a qualitative case study methodology with research about design approach, this research examines architectural typologies in Indonesia that utilize scaffolding as a fundamental element. The selected case studies span various project scales, encompassing both private and public functions and ranging from small to medium-sized developments. The primary aim of this study is to demonstrate how temporary structural elements can be reimagined as core components in spatial formation, presenting possibilities across various architectural applications. The reflections derived from this investigation are articulated as concepts and ideas that showcase how the temporality of architecture and structural elements can enhance sustainability in design. This study underscores the attributes of flexibility, adaptability, efficiency, and temporality in spaces and buildings formed through scaffolding-based designs. The findings reveal that innovative and creative applications of temporary structural elements as spatial formers hold considerable potential to advance sustainability in architectural discourse. The multifunctionality of such elements paves the way for more exploratory and unconventional design approaches. Additionally, this research highlights that scaffolding, when applied as a primary architectural element, can align with sustainability principles by enabling the creation of efficient, temporary spaces that are both adaptable and flexible. As a result, this study provides valuable insights for practitioners and academics seeking to develop innovative and sustainable approaches in architectural design
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".