GROUNDED EO: Data-driven Sentinel-2 LAI and FAPAR retrieval using Gaussian processes trained with extensive fiducial reference measurements
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Due to their importance in monitoring and modelling Earth's climate, the Global Climate Observing System (GCOS) designates leaf area index (LAI) and the fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active radiation (FAPAR) as essential climate variables (ECVs). The Simplified Level 2 Biophysical Processor (SL2P) has proven particularly popular for decametric (i.e. 10 m to 100 m) retrieval of these ECVs. Comprehensive validation has shown that due to simplifying assumptions in the underlying radiative transfer models (RTMs), biases persist in SL2P retrievals. To avoid RTM assumptions altogether, an empirical data-driven approach might be considered. Yet, such a strategy has historically been prevented by the limited quantity and quality of available in situ reference measurements, as well as the large number of training samples traditionally required by machine learning regression algorithms. New opportunities are now offered by recently established continental-scale environmental monitoring networks, advances in automated data processing and uncertainty evaluation, and machine learning regression algorithms that require many fewer training samples. The Ground Reference Observations Underlying Novel Decametric Vegetation Data Products from Earth Observation (GROUNDED EO) project was initiated to take advantage of these opportunities. We describe the empirical data-driven LAI and FAPAR retrieval approach adopted within the project, involving i) generation of a database containing over 16,000 fiducial reference measurements covering 81 National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON), Integrated Carbon Observation System (ICOS), and Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network (TERN) sites between 2013 and 2022, ii) development of an empirical data-driven algorithm for Sentinel-2 LAI and FAPAR retrieval based on Gaussian processes, and iii) evaluation of GROUNDED EO retrievals through intercomparison with the current state-of-the-art in decametric retrieval (i.e. SL2P, and a modified version of SL2P developed by the Canada Centre for Remote Sensing – SL2P-CCRS), as well as validation against unseen fiducial reference measurements. In the majority of cases (and despite not making use of ancillary data such as land cover), the empirical data-driven GROUNDED EO retrievals were subject to reduced bias than those from SL2P and SL2P-CCRS, as well as increased fulfilment of user requirements (i.e. 74% of LAI and 69% of FAPAR retrievals overall). Consequently, the approach has potential to reduce uncertainty in key inputs for climate monitoring and modelling, agricultural and forest management, and biodiversity assessment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".