MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410421568 · doi:10.1016/j.jtho.2025.05.012

Amivantamab in Participants With Advanced NSCLC and MET Exon 14 Skipping Mutations: Final Results From the CHRYSALIS Study

2025· article· en· W4410421568 on OpenAlexaff
Matthew Krebs, Byoung Chul Cho, Sandrine Hiret, Ji‐Youn Han, Ki Hyeong Lee, Casilda Llácer Pérez, Filippo de Braud, Eric B. Haura, Rachel E. Sanborn, James Chih‐Hsin Yang, Catherine A. Shu, Kōichi Goto, Makoto Nishio, Jun Zhao, Zhijie Wang, Pascale Tomasini, Enriqueta Felip, Jonathan W. Goldman, Sai‐Hong Ignatius Ou, Michael Boyer, Grace Gao, Siyang Qu, Joshua C. Curtin, Xuesong Lyu, Robert W. Schnepp, Priya Kim, Meena Thayu, Roland E. Knoblauch, Patricia Lorenzini, Mahadi Baig, Alexander I. Spira, Natasha B. Leighl

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Thoracic Oncology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
FundersLoxo OncologyChugai PharmaceuticalJanssen Research and DevelopmentEMD SeronoManchester Clinical Research FacilityGenentechLG ChemGrifolsPfizer JapanSociedad Española de Oncología MédicaOtsuka PharmaceuticalAstellas PharmaEisaiCurtin University of TechnologyClovis OncologyNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchBeiGeneMirati TherapeuticsRevolution MedicinesKisseiJohnson and JohnsonLes Laboratories Pierre FabrePfizerIncyteBoehringer Ingelheim JapanTaiho PharmaceuticalRegeneron PharmaceuticalsArray BioPharmaManchester Biomedical Research CentreYuhanDaiichi Sankyo EuropeServierGilead SciencesSanofiAmgenG1 TherapeuticsJounce TherapeuticsBayer YakuhinCelgeneAstraZenecaIgnytaOno PharmaceuticalEli Lilly and CompanyBristol-Myers Squibb
KeywordsMedicineExonLung cancerOncologyInternal medicinenon-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)MutationCancer researchGeneticsGeneBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Amivantamab is an EGFR-MET bispecific antibody with immune cell-directing activity. We assessed the safety and efficacy of amivantamab in participants with advanced NSCLC harboring primary MET exon 14 skipping mutations (METex14). METHODS: CHRYSALIS enrolled participants with METex14 NSCLC who progressed after or declined standard-of-care therapy. Participants received intravenous amivantamab weekly for 4 weeks and biweekly thereafter. Objective response rate, duration of response (DoR), clinical benefit rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, safety, and circulating tumor DNA were analyzed. RESULTS: Among 97 participants, 16 were treatment naive, 28 received prior treatment without MET therapies, and 53 received prior MET therapies. Objective response rate was 32% overall, 50% in treatment-naive participants, 46% in participants without prior MET therapies, and 19% in participants with prior MET therapies. In participants without prior MET therapies, amivantamab activity was observed regardless of co-occurring genomic alterations. Clinical benefit rate was 69% overall, 88% in treatment-naive participants, 64% in participants without prior MET therapies, and 66% in participants with prior MET therapies. Median DoR was 11.2 months; 61% (19/31) of the responders had DoR greater than or equal to 6 months. Median progression-free survival was 5.3 months (95% confidence interval, 4.3-7.0); median overall survival was 15.8 months (95% confidence interval, 14.6-not estimable). Most common adverse events were rash (79%) and infusion-related reactions (72%), most being grades 1 to 2 (52%). CONCLUSIONS: The safety profile was consistent with previous reports of amivantamab in EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Amivantamab demonstrated clinically meaningful and durable antitumor activity in participants with METex14 advanced NSCLC, including those who progressed on prior MET therapies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.471
Teacher spread0.429 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Thoracic OncologySame topicLung Cancer Treatments and MutationsFrench-language works237,207