MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410421990 · doi:10.1108/jpif-01-2025-0001

How Brexit changed the dynamics of UK commercial real estate: evidence from the roles of domestic and foreign monetary policies

2025· article· en· W4410421990 on OpenAlexaff
Alain Coën, Philippe Guardiola

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Property Investment and Finance · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicHousing Market and Economics
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrexitReal estateDynamics (music)Monetary policyInternational economicsEconomicsInternational tradeMonetary economicsFinanceEuropean unionSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose The main objective of this article is to investigate the impact of conventional and unconventional monetary policies led by the Bank of England, the ECB and the Fed on the dynamics of British commercial real estate markets between 2000 and 2023, using vector autoregression and structural vector autoregression (SVAR) models. We propose comparative analysis of eight commercial real estate markets, including financial and REIT markets, contrary to the previous literature. Design/methodology/approach We consider the dynamics and returns of eight UK commercial real estate markets on a monthly basis, shedding new light on the monetary policies’ impact over 24 years. We proceed in three steps. First, we develop a structural VAR model. Second, we report the impulse response analysis. Third, we focus on the relative impact of the Brexit. Findings We show that monetary policies have a highly significant impact on eight British commercial real estate sectors, with different implications. Favourable policies from the BoE and Fed have a positive impact on the returns of all asset classes, while the ECB has an investment drain effect. As an illustration of financialization, REITs seem to be a transmission channel for all asset classes. However, Brexit appears to mark a major turning point as the BoE and BCE monetary policy effects drop sharply after 2016. Practical implications These results are valuable for investors, as the central bank’s monetary policies significantly affect the performances of their portfolio. They could also be beneficial to the central banks themselves, as we have entered a new policy cycle in 2024, and its effect on UK real estate remains uncertain. Originality/value A parsimonious structural VAR model is used to study the dynamics of conventional and unconventional monetary policies led by the BoE, the ECB and the Fed on eight UK commercial real estate markets’ returns during 24 years, marked by important breaking points: Office City, Office Mid Town & West End, Office Rest of South East, Office Rest of the UK, Retail South East, Retail Rest of the UK, Industrial South East and Industrial Rest of the UK. Our results, highlighting the relative importance of conventional and unconventional monetary shocks, identify the existence of heterogeneous effects of monetary policies on the different markets, shedding new light on the transmission channel played by the REITs and stocks markets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.140
Threshold uncertainty score0.288

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Property Investment and FinanceSame topicHousing Market and EconomicsFrench-language works237,207