MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Efficiency of Rearing the African Palm Weevil (Rhynchophorus phoenicis) in Different Substrates as Arsenal for Addressing Malnutrition in Children

2025· article· en· W4410422085 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Child Health and Nutrition · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect Utilization and Effects
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineWeevilMalnutritionPalmEnvironmental healthTraditional medicineBotanyInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Rhynchophorus phoenicis is arguably one of the most sought-after edible insects in the tropics. It is widely distributed in Africa and is a major pest of palm trees in Africa, Southern Asia, and South America. Globally, the population has been predicted to surpass 9 billion by 2050, leading to food insecurity. Objective: This research investigated rearing the edible insect (Rhynchophorus phoenicis) in different substrates under laboratory conditions to address problems associated with the weevils' availability for solving malnutrition issues in children when consumed. Methods: Ten (10) adult palm weevils were reared in different substrates (coconut husk, sugarcane, pawpaw, and a combination of all the substrates) under laboratory conditions with palm fiber as the control and arranged in triplicates to assess their emergence and survival. Data on larvae emergence, survival, and pupation were obtained within four (4) to eight (8) weeks post-emergence. Results: The rearing experiments showed that larvae emergence and survival (184.08±19.7), pupation rate (53.25±7.0), and adult emergence (12.92±1.8) were highest in coconut husk and least in pawpaw substrate. There was also a significant difference between the larvae emergence and survival, pupation, and adult emergence in the various substrates compared to the control (p<0.05). Implication: The study demonstrated the feasibility of mass-rearing African palm weevil (Rhynchophorus phoenicis) larvae, which, if incorporated into children's diets, will be immensely significant in solving nutritional deficiencies and problems associated with malnutrition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.459
Threshold uncertainty score0.122

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it