MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410428120 · doi:10.1109/tmc.2025.3570851

Multi-Variate Time Series Prediction of Traffic and Users for Dynamic RRH-BBU Mapping in C-RAN

2025· article· en· W4410428120 on OpenAlexaff
Fan Wu, Shanshan Wang, Jieyu Zhou, Conghao Zhou, Wang Yang, Feng Lyu, Yaoxue Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicBrain Tumor Detection and Classification
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersKey Research and Development Program of Hunan Province of ChinaNatural Science Foundation of Hainan ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceSeries (stratigraphy)Computer networkTime seriesRandom variateData miningMachine learningMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cellular operators face significant challenges in cutting operating expenses while maintaining the quality of service (QoS) for users due to growing network traffic and dynamic user connections. These challenges are addressed by the cloud radio access network (C-RAN) architecture, which includes a centralized pool of baseband units (BBUs) and distributes them from remote radio heads (RRHs). The key to improving C-RAN performance is to dynamically allocate large-scale RRHs to different BBUs in real time. In this paper, we propose a user behavior-aware RRH-BBU mapping framework to improve the performance of large-scale C-RANs by predicting RRH traffic and users in advance. First, we propose a Multivariate RRH time series Prediction Model (MRPM) that captures the spatio-temporal patterns in the data to predict the traffic volume and the number of users of RRHs, which represents key indicators of RRH connection states. Second, we formulate the RRH-BBU mapping as a Markov decision process problem to optimize cost and QoS by considering BBU utilization, BBU energy consumption, RRH migration frequency, and BBU load balancing. Third, we propose a prediction-based RRH-BBU mapping scheme (PB-RBM) to find the optimal RRH-BBU mapping strategy by leveraging the prediction information of MRPM. In the PB-RBM algorithm, we employ an A3C algorithm to learn the mapping policy and group the RRHs based on a defined popularity metric to reduce the state and action space of the reinforcement learning algorithm. Finally, extensive experiments are conducted on a real-world dataset, and our algorithm is compared with several matching algorithms, such as ACKTR, heuristic, etc., to demonstrate its superiority, especially reducing 17.5% in RMSE compared to the best-performing baseline.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.638
Threshold uncertainty score0.558

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Mobile ComputingSame topicBrain Tumor Detection and ClassificationFrench-language works237,207