MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410437899 · doi:10.70803/001c.138253

Analysis of Field-Measured Reversible Deformations in Masonry Cavity Walls

2015· article· en· W4410437899 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Masonry Society Journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCivil and Structural Engineering Research
Canadian institutionsRead Jones Christoffersen (Canada)University of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMasonryField (mathematics)GeologyCavity wallMaterials scienceGeotechnical engineeringStructural engineeringEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A remote monitoring system was installed in a 17-year-old clock tower in St. Albert, Alberta, Canada to record and analyze the vertical deformations of its masonry cavity walls. An hourly record of temperature, humidity, and vertical movements in the walls over a period of 638 days has been collected and analyzed. The observations suggest that reversible moisture effects are significant and that radiation-induced temperature spikes could be much higher than what is accounted for by current guidelines for the design of movement joints. It is demonstrated that peak reversible moisture and thermal strains estimated using the Commentaries to the 2010 National Building Code of Canada (NBCC) may be unconservative and that peak design temperature is severely underestimated. Revisions to bring the design values of the 2010 NBCC Commentaries into closer agreement with those of CSA S304.1-04 and ASTM C1472-10 are recommended.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.278

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it