MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410441618 · doi:10.1080/13803395.2025.2505582

Exploring the functional utility of the Advanced Clinical Solutions-Social Perception Affect Naming subtest in treatment-resistant psychosis

2025· article· en· W4410441618 on OpenAlexaff
Ivan Caramanna, Daniah Zumrawi, Brianne L. Glazier, Mahesh Menon, Olga Leonova, William G. Honer, Randall F. White, Ivan J. Torres

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSchizophrenia research and treatment
Canadian institutionsBC Mental Health & Substance Use ServicesUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyAffect (linguistics)PsychosisPerceptionDevelopmental psychologyCognitive psychologyClinical psychologyPsychiatryNeuroscienceCommunication

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Despite the recognized importance of social cognition in predicting functional outcomes in schizophrenia, there is a lack of widely accepted measures that assess this broad domain while possessing psychometric validity and predictive utility. This study aimed to address this gap by providing incremental validity data for a promising social cognitive measure assessing facial affect recognition in patients presenting with treatment-resistant psychosis. METHOD: Using a clinical archival dataset comprising 59 consecutive admissions to an inpatient treatment-resistant psychosis unit, this study examined facial affect naming performance from the Advanced Clinical Solutions-Social Perception (ACS-SP) affect naming subtest, and the association with neuropsychological functioning and symptom severity. Hierarchical regression models were used to assess whether facial affect recognition predicted daily functioning, including measures of functional capacity and functional performance. RESULTS: The ACS-SP affect naming measure showed limited sensitivity for impairment relative to other cognitive domains. Affect naming showed weak to moderate correlations with a broad range of non-memory cognitive functions, and no association with symptom severity. After controlling for cognitive functioning and symptoms, the ACS-SP affect naming task predicted poorer functioning with regard to functional performance but not functional capacity. CONCLUSIONS: The ACS-SP affect naming task associates weakly to moderately with other measures of cognition, but also likely taps into social cognitive skills not measured by typical neuropsychological tests. This measure was predictive of some aspects of functional outcomes in patients with treatment-resistant psychosis, and therefore may be a useful tool to incorporate into routine neuropsychological assessments in such treatment settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.257
GPT teacher head0.474
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical and Experimental NeuropsychologySame topicSchizophrenia research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207