MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410447583 · doi:10.1093/bjs/znaf092.011

Plasma Fibronectin Released by Peritoneal Macrophages Promotes Remote Skin Wound Healing

2025· article· en· W4410447583 on OpenAlexaff
Lilian Salm, S Zwicky, Tural Yarahmadov, Marie Siwicki, Fernanda V. S. Castanheira, Daniel Spari, Joël Zindel, Antoine Dufour, Deborah Stroka, Paul Kubes, Guido Beldi

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish journal of surgery · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicWound Healing and Treatments
Canadian institutionsAlberta Bone and Joint Health InstituteUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineWound healingFibronectinImmunologySurgeryPathologyCell biologyExtracellular matrix

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Large peritoneal macrophages (LPMs), located in the peritoneal cavity, are essential for local tissue repair. However, their contribution to tissue repair at distant sites remains unclear. Aims This study investigates the role of LPM activation in skin wound healing at remote sites Methods A novel mouse model combining peritoneal stimulation (PS) with a skin injury was used to assess LPM-mediated effects on remote skin wound healing. Dual Cre and Flippase fate-mapping tracked GATA6-expressing LPMs to evaluate their migratory behavior. Parabiosis experiments and administration of activated peritoneal fluid were conducted to identify the role of circulating factors. Proteomic and transcriptomic analyses were used to characterize LPM-secreted molecules. Fluorescently labelled fibronectin was tracked in plasma and skin wounds. Results Activation of LPMs trough PS significantly accelerated healing of remote skin wounds. Removing LPMs or using mice lacking LPMs abolished the beneficial effect. Adoptive transfer of LPMs but not B-cells after LPM depletion was sufficient to rescue the phenotype. Fate-mapping demonstrated that LPMs did not migrate to distant wounds after activation. Parabiosis and peritoneal fluid transfer experiments indicated the role of LPM-derived circulating signaling molecules in remote skin wound healing. Proteomic and transcriptomic analyses identified fibronectin as critical mediator, as adoptive transfer of LyzMcre Fnflox peritoneal cells failed to rescue the impaired remote wound healing phenotype in LPM deficient mice. Protein-coding fibronectin isoforms transcribed by LPMs, correspond to the soluble plasma. Fluorescently labelled fibronectin was detected in the plasma and incorporated into skin wounds following adoptive transfer of Fngfp/gfp peritoneal cells and PS. Conclusion LPMs act as a source of circulating fibronectin, facilitating extracellular matrix formation and promoting wound healing at remote sites. These findings reveal a novel endocrine role for LPMs in systemic tissue repair, and challenge the traditional perspective, that plasma fibronectin is exclusively liver derived.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.735
Threshold uncertainty score0.623

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish journal of surgerySame topicWound Healing and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207