MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410456036 · doi:10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf059

Sex differences based on the timing of invasive management among patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: an individual patient data meta-analysis

2025· article· en· W4410456036 on OpenAlex
Graziella Pompei, Gregory Mills, Christos P. Kotanidis, Shamir R Mehta, Denise Tiong, Erik Badings, Thomas Engstrøm, Arnoud W.J. van ’t Hof, Dan Eik Høfsten, Lene Holmvang, Alexander Jobs, Lars Køber, Dejan Milašinović, Aleksandra Milošević, Goran Stanković, Holger Thiele, Roxana Mehran, Vijay Kunadian

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Myocardial Infarction Research
Canadian institutionsHamilton Health SciencesMcMaster UniversityPopulation Health Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcute coronary syndromeMeta-analysisMedicineElevation (ballistics)ST elevationInternal medicinePatient dataEmergency medicineCoronary heart diseaseMyocardial infarctionComputer scienceDatabaseEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Aims Studies investigating the timing of coronary angiography in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) have not evaluated sex differences. This study aims to investigate the sex-related differences in outcomes of NSTE-ACS patients undergoing early or delayed invasive management. Methods and results An individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis was performed after systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing early vs. delayed invasive strategy among NSTE-ACS patients. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death or myocardial infarction (MI) at 6 months. Secondary endpoints included all-cause death, MI, recurrent ischaemia, stroke, and major bleeding. One-stage, random-effects Cox models were conducted. This meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023468604). Six RCTs including 6654 patients were identified, of whom 2257 (33.9%) were females with a median age of 69 years [interquartile range (IQR) 60–76], significantly higher than males (64.5 years, IQR 55–72.1, P < 0.001). Among patients undergoing early strategy, there was no sex difference in the occurrence of the primary [Hazard ratio (HR) 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83–1.41, P = 0.560] and secondary endpoints. Among patients undergoing delayed strategy, there was no difference in the occurrence of the primary endpoint (HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.88–1.43, P = 0.350). Female sex undergoing delayed strategy was associated with higher risk of recurrent ischaemia (HR 1.52, 95% CI 1.06–2.19, P = 0.023) and major bleeding (HR 1.88, 95% CI 1.22–2.87, P = 0.004) using univariable analysis but not using multivariable analysis. Conclusion No sex-related differences in the composite of all-cause death or MI were identified among NSTE-ACS patients undergoing early and delayed invasive management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.197
Threshold uncertainty score0.767

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.175
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it