MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410470705 · doi:10.2196/68029

Monte Carlo dose estimation of absorbed dose to the hematopoietic stem cell layer of the bone marrow assuming non-uniform distribution around the vascular endothelium of the bone marrow (Preprint)

2024· article· en· W4410470705 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Noriko Kobayashi

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIRx Med · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiation Dose and Imaging
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBone marrowStem cellNuclideAbsorbed doseHaematopoiesisNuclear medicineDosimetryChemistryMedicinePathologyBiologyPhysicsCell biologyNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Recent studies have shown that hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) are concentrated around the endothelium of the sinusoidal capillaries. However, the current dosimetry model proposed by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) does not account for the heterogeneity of bone marrow tissue and stem cell distribution. If the location of the hematopoietic stem cell layer differs from previous assumptions, it is necessary to re-evaluate the dose. It is especially important for short-range alpha particles where the energy deposited in the target HSC layer can vary greatly depending on the distance from the source region. Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the red bone marrow doses assuming that the hematopoietic stem cell layer of the bone marrow is localized in the vascular endothelium. Methods: A model of the trabecular bone tissues in the cervical vertebrae was developed using the Particle and Heavy Ion Transport System code. Radiation transport simulations were performed for beta and alpha radionuclides as well as noble gases, and the absorbed doses to the stem cell layer within the perivascular HSC layer of the bone marrow from inhaled radionuclides were estimated. The estimated doses were then compared with the absorbed dose based on the ICRP 60 and ICRP 103 recommendations. Results: The absorbed doses to the bone marrow obtained from the model calculations were not significantly different from ICRP 60 and ICRP 103 for beta-nuclides. However, for alpha-nuclides, the absorbed doses were much lower than previously estimated. In addition, the contribution of red bone marrow and blood sources was greater than that of trabecular bone for alpha-nuclides. Noble gases in the red bone marrow may also affect the bone marrow stem cell layer. Conclusions: The bone marrow dose assessment for alpha nuclides and noble gases should be re-examined using a precise model based on computed tomography images from the perspective of occupational and public radiation protection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.160
Threshold uncertainty score0.387

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIRx MedSame topicRadiation Dose and ImagingFrench-language works237,207