MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4410471179 · doi:10.7759/cureus.84338

Seizure-Induced Periprosthetic Femoral Fracture After Total Hip Arthroplasty in a Patient With Epilepsy: A Case Report

2025· article· en· W4410471179 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zain Sayeed

Bibliographic record

VenueCureus · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePeriprostheticTotal hip arthroplastyEpilepsyArthroplastySurgeryFemoral fractureHip arthroplastyFemurPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fractures secondary to seizure activity are a well-known complication in patients with epilepsy; however, periprosthetic fractures following total hip arthroplasty (THA) due to seizures are rarely documented. Nonadherence to anti-epileptic medications (AEMs) significantly increases the risk of seizure recurrence, particularly in individuals with a history of seizure-induced skeletal trauma. We present the case of a 27-year-old male with a documented history of epilepsy who sustained a right periprosthetic femoral fracture following a generalized tonic-clonic seizure. One year prior, the patient had undergone THA due to post-traumatic acetabular arthritis, which developed after a seizure-induced acetabular fracture. He later became noncompliant with his prescribed levetiracetam regimen, discontinuing use approximately one month after his initial THA. Imaging revealed a Vancouver B2 periprosthetic fracture with femoral stem subsidence. The patient underwent revision THA with open reduction and internal fixation and had an uneventful postoperative course. This case highlights the critical importance of medication adherence in patients with epilepsy, especially those with prior seizure-related orthopedic injuries. It also raises the need for further research into the long-term effects of levetiracetam on bone health. Regardless of the specific AEM, physicians should maintain a high index of suspicion for bone health deterioration and consider routine bone mineral density screening in this unique patient population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0050.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCureus→Same topicOrthopaedic implants and arthroplasty→French-language works237,207→