MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410477056 · doi:10.1016/j.tca.2025.180035

Quantification of hydroxide in co-precipitated nickel, manganese, cobalt carbonate precursor via TG-MS analyses

2025· article· en· W4410477056 on OpenAlexafffund
Valérie Charbonneau, François Larouche, Kamyab Amouzegar, Gervais Soucy, Jocelyn Veilleux

Bibliographic record

VenueThermochimica Acta · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAnalytical chemistry methods development
Canadian institutionsHydro-QuébecUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFonds de recherche du QuébecUniversité de Sherbrooke
KeywordsCobaltManganeseNickelCarbonateHydroxideCobalt extraction techniquesChemistryInorganic chemistryCobalt hydroxideNuclear chemistryElectrochemistryOrganic chemistryPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A significant obstacle associated with the synthesis of carbonate precursors for lithium nickel manganese cobalt oxides (NMC) is the concurrent precipitation of nickel hydroxide. Depending on the synthesis conditions and on the desired transition metals stoichiometric ratio, nickel may precipitate solely in its hydroxide form, even with excess carbonate present in the synthesis medium. The present work investigates the use of thermogravimetry-mass spectrometry (TG-MS) technique to quantify the dehydration, dehydroxylation and decarbonation of such mixed precursors. A calibration curve built for the dehydroxylation of nickel hydroxide with a copper sulfate internal standard allowed for the differentiation of sample weight loss associated to either hydrates or hydroxides. Thereafter, the numerical deconvolution of derivative TG and MS peaks obtained for NMC precursors enabled the calculation of atomic percentages of metal hydroxides and carbonates. Various commonly cited mathematical models for deconvolution are examined to investigate the quality of fitted data. According to this research, asymmetric double sigmoidal functions best represented the TG-MS data obtained for NMC carbonate precursors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThermochimica ActaSame topicAnalytical chemistry methods developmentFrench-language works237,207