MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Perceptions of Self-compassion in Undergraduate Women: A Photo Elicitation Study

2025· article· en· W4410481564 on OpenAlex
Sarah Galway, Deanna Buchmayer, Kimberley L. Gammage

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Open Psychology Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologySelf-compassionPhoto elicitationPerceptionCompassionSocial psychologyDevelopmental psychologyClinical psychologyMindfulnessSociologyAnthropology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Self-compassion is broadly defined by researchers as compassion directed toward oneself, encompassing self-love, common humanity, and mindfulness. However, beyond specific groups such as adolescents, individuals with anxiety and depression, and female exercisers, how the general public defines and perceives self-compassion remains underexplored. It is important to understand how other individuals define and experience self-compassion so that interventions targeted toward increasing self-compassion are meaningful for participants. Objective The purpose of the present study was to examine perceptions of self-compassion among female university students aged 18 to 24. Methods Semi-structured interviews using photo-elicitation were conducted with nine women. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using reflective thematic analysis. Results Participants had difficulty defining self compassion. Three themes were generated from the data, including: 1) describing self-compassion as tricky, 2) understanding the self in self-compassion, and 3) self-compassion as a tool. Discussion Participants had difficulty defining self-compassion and often referred to examples of compassion directed towards and received from others to describe the concept. Participants described ways in which self-compassion was adaptive and how practicing self-compassion helped them overcome personal challenges. These findings highlight the importance of psychoeducation to continue to deconstruct misconceptions about self-compassion, and to address conceptual gaps between how self-compassion is defined in the literature and how it is understood by general populations. Conclusion Given the difficulty of defining self-compassion, researchers should focus on knowledge translation strategies to help foster self-compassion in young women.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.689
Threshold uncertainty score0.989

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.429
Teacher spread0.394 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it