MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410482488 · doi:10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf236.026

Impaired peak oxygen uptake in older patients with heart failure: a systematic-review and meta-analysis

2025· article· en· W4410482488 on OpenAlexaff
V Schmid, Sue Paterson, Jianlong Wang, Corey R. Tomczak, David Niederseer, Jan Vontobel, Michael D. Nelson, Daniel Forman, Stephen Foulkes, Mark J. Haykowsky

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Preventive Cardiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular and exercise physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHeart failureMeta-analysisMEDLINECardiologyVO2 maxInternal medicineGerontologyIntensive care medicinePhysical therapyHeart rateBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Reduced peak exercise oxygen uptake (VO2peak) is a hallmark feature of heart failure (HF). Despite its importance, few studies have measured VO2peak in older HF patients. Purpose Aim 1) To assess VO2peak in older (mean age ≥ 65 yrs) HF patients and controls (CON); Aim 2) To compare VO2peak in HF patients across the older age continuum (i.e., young-old, YO, 60-69 yrs vs. middle-old, MO, 70-79 yrs vs. old-old, OO, ≥ 80 yrs). Methods The PubMed database was searched (1967-May 2024) for studies meeting the following inclusion criteria: 1) HF (mean age ≥ 65 yrs); 2) VO2peak assessed by maximal cardiopulmonary testing; and 3) non-HF CON (Aim 1 only). For Aim 2, included studies needed to compare VO2peak between YO vs. MO or MO vs. OO HF patients. A random effects meta-analysis was conducted comparing VO2peak (and its Fick determinants if reported) in HF vs. CON (Aim 1) and VO2peak between YO vs. MO and MO vs. OO patients with HF (Aim 2). Results are presented as weighted mean differences (WMD) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Results 38 studies out of 2,788 screened articles met our inclusion criteria. For Aim 1, 30 studies were included (HF, n=1,093, mean age: 70 yrs, 46% females and CON, n=942, mean age: 69 yrs, 52% females). Compared to CON, peak exercise VO2, cardiac output and heart rate were significantly lower in HF with no significant difference between groups for peak exercise stroke volume or arterial-venous content O2 content difference (Figure 1). For Aim 2, 8 studies were analysed: YO, n=3,394 vs. MO, n= 2,445 and MO, n=877 vs. OO, n= 271. VO2peak significantly decreased by 1.5 mL/kg/min and 1.2 mL/kg/min between MO and YO, and OO vs. MO, respectively (Figure 2). Conclusion Older HF patients experience a marked reduction in VO2peak compared to age-matched controls. This decrease is primarily due to a lower peak exercise heart rate and reduced cardiac output. VO2peak in patients with HF decreases progressively with age. Future studies are required to examine the impact of exercise training to improve VO2peak and exercise cardiac function in older patients with HF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.476
Threshold uncertainty score0.530

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Preventive CardiologySame topicCardiovascular and exercise physiologyFrench-language works237,207