Tiotropium Initiation and Dementia Risk in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Importance: Long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs), such as tiotropium, are inhaled anticholinergic bronchodilators. However, there is limited clinical evidence examining whether LAMAs may have clinically meaningful central anticholinergic effects, such as increased dementia risk. Objective: To determine the association between tiotropium initiation and dementia risk in older adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based, active-comparator, new-user cohort study used linkable administrative databases from Ontario, Canada, with a target trial emulation framework. The cohort included new users of tiotropium monotherapy or a long-acting β2-agonist plus inhaled corticosteroid (LABA-ICS) who were 66 years or older with COPD and without dementia, from September 4, 2004, to February 29, 2012. The follow-up period was up to 10 years from treatment initiation. Analyses were conducted from May 13, 2024, to March 6, 2025. Exposures: Tiotropium monotherapy initiators were compared with LABA-ICS initiators. The primary analysis used an intention-to-treat exposure definition. Main Outcomes and Measures: Incident dementia was determined using a validated algorithm. A 1-year lag time was implemented to mitigate reverse causality and to account for disease latency. Cause-specific hazard ratios (HRs) with death as a competing risk were obtained from Cox models with propensity score fine stratification weights. Weighted incidence rate differences (IRDs) per 1000 person-years were calculated. Results: Among 30 960 tiotropium monotherapy initiators and 19 530 LABA-ICS initiators, the mean (SD) age was 75.1 (6.7) years and 46.7% were female. Over a median (IQR) follow-up period of 7.59 (3.91-10.0) years from treatment initiation, tiotropium monotherapy vs LABA-ICS initiation was associated with a small increase in dementia risk per 1000 person-years (incidence rates, 29.6 [95% CI, 28.8-30.4] vs 27.4 [95% CI, 26.4-28.3]; IRD, 2.3 [95% CI, 1.0-3.5]; HR, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.04-1.14]). The secondary as-treated analysis showed no significant association per 1000 person-years (incidence rates, 24.1 [95% CI, 22.2-26.0] vs 21.4 [95% CI, 18.5-24.3]; IRD, 2.7 [95% CI, -0.8 to 6.1]; HR, 1.11 [95% CI, 0.93-1.32]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, among older adults with COPD, the small absolute rate increase in incident dementia associated with tiotropium monotherapy vs LABA-ICS was of questionable clinical importance, particularly when weighed against the established clinical benefits of tiotropium.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".