MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410493616 · doi:10.1002/ehf2.15294

SGLT2 Inhibitor with and without ALDosterone AntagonIst for Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction: Design Paper

2025· article· en· W4410493616 on OpenAlexaff
João Pedro Ferreira, Francisco Vasques‐Nóvoa, Francisca Saraiva, Ana Oliveira, Jorge Almeida, Ana Beatriz Batista, Arsénio Barbosa, Ana Filipa Ferreira, Cátia Costa, Diogo Santos‐Ferreira, Fernando Friões, João Tiago Guimarães, Marta Leite, Pedro Marques, Joana Mascarenhas, Maria Inês Matos, Catarina Pereira, Pedro Rodrigues, Abhinav Sharma, Gualter Silva, Inês Pereira‐Sousa, Carla Sousa, Faïez Zannad, Joana Pimenta, Ricardo Fontes‐Carvalho, Adelino Leite‐Moreira

Bibliographic record

VenueESC Heart Failure · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
FundersFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaAstraZeneca
KeywordsHeart failureAldosteroneEjection fractionMedicineAntagonistInternal medicineCardiologyPharmacologyReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) reduce heart failure (HF) events in patients with heart failure and mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction (HFmr/pEF). The randomized comparison of SGLT2i/MRA combination versus SGLT2i or MRA alone requires further testing in HFmr/pEF. AIMS: To compare the efficacy (NT-proBNP change as primary outcome) and safety (potassium, creatinine, and blood pressure changes) of dapagliflozin/spironolactone combination versus dapagliflozin alone (primary comparison) and spironolactone alone (exploratory comparison). METHODS: SOGALDI-PEF (SOdium-Glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, ALDosterone AntagonIst, or both for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; NCT05676684), a proof-of-concept investigator-initiated two-centre randomized cross-over trial comparing three arms (dapagliflozin, spironolactone, or both) for three periods of 12 weeks each intercalated by a wash-out period of 4 weeks. After two independent trials demonstrating efficacy of SGLT2i in HFmr/pEF, a mid-trial protocol amendment dropped the spironolactone alone sequence and reduced the wash-out period to 1 week. A sample size of 108 patients was estimated to provide 80% power, at a 0.05 alfa level, to detect a 0.15 LogNT-proBNP difference between the spironolactone/dapagliflozin combination and dapagliflozin alone sequence. RESULTS: , and 93% having an ejection fraction ≥ 50%. The median serum potassium was 4.3 mmol/L, and the median NT-proBNP was 764 pg/mL. Most patients were treated with renin-angiotensin blockers (68%), beta-blockers (70%) and loop diuretics (69%). Compared to other HFmr/pEF trials, SOGALDI-PEF patients were older, were more frequently women, had a high prevalence of atrial fibrillation, and had more often a preserved ejection fraction. CONCLUSIONS: SOGALDI-PEF will be the first trial in HFmr/pEF to test the combination of dapagliflozin/spironolactone vs dapagliflozin alone in a randomized manner. SOGALDI-PEF will provide information on the potential efficacy and safety of concomitant administration of spironolactone with dapagliflozin vs dapagliflozin alone in an elderly population with HFmr/pEF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.396
Threshold uncertainty score0.842

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueESC Heart FailureSame topicDiabetes Treatment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207