MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4410495462 · doi:10.1016/j.jogc.2025.102929

Fetal, Neonatal, and Infant Mortality Surveillance in Nova Scotia: A Population-Based Cohort Study Examining Temporal Trends From 1988 to 2022

2025· article· en· W4410495462 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Victoria M. Allen, John Fahey, Christy Woolcott

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Maternal and Child Health
Canadian institutionsNova Scotia Health AuthorityDalhousie University
FundersDalhousie UniversityNova Scotia Department of Health and Wellness
KeywordsMedicineNova scotiaInfant mortalityCohortPopulationDemographyObstetricsCohort studyNeonatal mortalityFetal deathSingletonFetusPregnancyEnvironmental healthInternal medicineOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: To describe annual trends in the incidence of stillbirth and infant mortality in Nova Scotia over a 35-year period. METHODS: weeks gestation or ≥500 g were included. Rates of fetal death (per 1000 births) and neonatal and infant mortality (per 1000 live births) were calculated by birth year. Rates were reported for the entire cohort and stratified by birth parent age, birthweight for gestational age and sex, and number of fetuses. RESULTS: A total of 334 776 deliveries were included, with 332 975 of these being live births; there were 1801 stillbirths, 1082 neonatal deaths, and 1579 infant deaths. Rates of fetal, neonatal, and infant death decreased between 1988-1992 and 2018-2022 (6.8-4.8, 4.0-2.5, and 6.3-4.0 per 1000 births, respectively). Rates increased somewhat in later 5-year epochs among those ≥35 years of age. Rates in the <10th percentile of birthweight for gestational age were highest in earlier epochs and showed a general downward trend with each epoch except the last. Marked temporal reductions in rates among multiple gestations were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Increases in mortality in later epochs, and among select birth parents and infant factors, suggest that patient characteristics and clinical practice changes may play a role in these increases. The observed temporal changes are important in informing the evaluation of factors associated with stillbirth and infant mortality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.193
Threshold uncertainty score0.389

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada→Same topicGlobal Maternal and Child Health→French-language works237,207→