MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410497321 · doi:10.1186/s40462-025-00561-6

Flexibility in female spatiotemporal behavioral tactics to counter infanticide risk during the mating season

2025· article· en· W4410497321 on OpenAlex
Rick W. Heeres, Martin Leclerc, Shane C. Frank, Alexander Kopatz, Fanie Pelletier, Andreas Zedrosser

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueMovement Ecology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicNeuroendocrine regulation and behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMiljødirektoratetNaturvårdsverketCanada Research ChairsAustrian Science FundSvenska JägareförbundetUniversitetet i Sørøst-NorgeE.W.R. Steacie Memorial Fund
KeywordsOffspringAnimal ecologyPaternal careDemographyMatingBiologySeasonal breederEcologyPregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Parental care is exclusively provided by females in most mammals, and mothers use several spatiotemporal behavioral tactics to minimize risks to offspring and to enhance fitness of both the mother and offspring. In species with infanticide and varying maternal care duration, dependent offspring remain vulnerable to male infanticide until separation from the mother. However, extending maternal care likely results in parent-offspring conflicts. We investigated the spatiotemporal behavioral tactics of lone female brown bears and mothers accompanied by offspring of varying ages in relation to infanticide risk and offspring separation during the mating season. METHODS: We used data from 144 individuals (92 females and 52 males, 2003-2022) to characterize female spatiotemporal behavioral responses to males during the mating season by contrasting home range and encounter area sizes, proximity to males, and dyadic associations in relation to female reproductive status. We investigated the spatiotemporal behavioral responses of mothers from a socio-spatial perspective by connecting large-scale movement behavior (home range and overlap) and small-scale social behavior (proximity and associations) of adult females and males. RESULTS: We found that females with dependent offspring of any age avoided males during the mating season. In comparison, lone females or mothers that lost or separated from their offspring during the mating season used larger areas and moved in closer proximity to males. The home range of mothers that remained with their offspring still largely overlapped with male home ranges, however, they did not associate (< 100 m) with males. Additionally, mothers with yearlings had similar sized home ranges as solitary females, but larger home ranges in comparison to mothers with cubs-of-the-year. This suggests that mothers with yearlings are more conspicuous on the landscape which may result in a higher detectability by males. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that mothers with offspring of any age perceive adult males as potential source of infanticide and use spatiotemporal avoidance tactics. Generally, family groups had high home range overlap with adult males, but family groups that remained together throughout the mating season did not associate with any adult male. Mothers with yearlings used larger areas in comparison to mothers with cubs, potentially indicating their increasing energetic needs. The use of spatiotemporal behavioral tactics to avoid infanticide by females with dependent offspring irrespective of age likely disrupts movement, mating, and social dynamics and on the long-term potentially increases the risk of infanticide to older offspring.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it