MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410510683 · doi:10.1164/rccm.202505-1054st

Approach to the Evaluation and Management of Interstitial Lung Abnormalities: An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Statement

2025· review· en· W4410510683 on OpenAlexaff
Anna J. Podolanczuk, Gary M. Hunninghake, Kevin C. Wilson, Yet H. Khor, Fayez Kheir, Brandon Pang, Ayodeji Adegunsoye, Gretchen Cararie, JAMES FLANAGAN, Gunnar Guðmundsson, Lida P. Hariri, Hiroto Hatabu, Stephen M. Humphries, Bhavika Kaul, John S. Kim, Mélanie Königshoff, Jonathan A. Kropski, Joyce Lee, David A. Lynch, Fernando J. Martínez, Sydney B. Montesi, Yuben Moodley, Justin M. Oldham, Sara Piciucchi, Rachel K. Putman, Luca Richeldi, Iván O. Rosas, Margaret L. Salisbury, Mary Salvatore, Moisés Selman, Joon Beom Seo, Jin Woo Song, Carey C. Thomson, Marina Vivero, Louise V. Wain, Marlies Wijsenbeek, David A. Schwartz, Christopher J. Ryerson

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInterstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersLung Foundation NetherlandsDaewoong Pharmaceutical CompanyNational Research FoundationMedical Research CouncilNational Research Foundation of KoreaDepartment of Health and Social CareGenentechVeracyteSyndax PharmaceuticalsGalectoWellcome TrustBristol-Myers SquibbEuropean Respiratory SocietyEisaiFibroGenMannKind CorporationNational Institutes of HealthRegeneron PharmaceuticalsPfizerBiogenBioClinicaF. Hoffmann-La RocheU.S. Department of DefenseSanofiCelgeneNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteSavara PharmaceuticalsUCLA Health SystemGlaxoSmithKlineNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchCSL BehringNational Health and Medical Research CouncilAstraZenecaAmerican Thoracic SocietyPulmonary Fibrosis FoundationU.S. Department of Veterans AffairsDaiichi Sankyo EuropeGilead Sciences
KeywordsMedicineHoneycombingInterstitial lung diseaseBronchiectasisLungPulmonary function testingIdiopathic pulmonary fibrosisIntensive care medicineRadiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background There is growing interest in identifying early stages of interstitial lung disease (ILD) to improve patient outcomes. This document reviews updated evidence on interstitial lung abnormalities (ILAs); provides suggestions for screening, evaluation, and management; proposes criteria for distinguishing ILAs from ILD; and identifies research priorities. Methods A committee of clinical and methodology experts met by video conference to define ILAs and ILD by consensus and voted on 11 prespecified questions after reviewing synthesized evidence from a systematic literature search. Agreement of ≥70% was required to approve each suggestion. Results ILA is defined as nondependent bilateral parenchymal abnormalities on computed tomography, including ground-glass opacities or reticulations, lung distortion, traction bronchiectasis, and/or honeycombing involving ≥5% of a lung zone. The updated definition removes the prior exclusion of high-risk populations. ILD is distinguished from ILAs by symptoms (dyspnea/cough) attributable to an interstitial process, abnormal or declining lung function, fibrotic (honeycombing and/or reticulation with traction bronchiectasis involving ≥5% of total lung volume) or progressive imaging abnormalities, and/or specific fibrotic ILD patterns on imaging or pathology. Suggestions include ILA/ILD assessment on imaging acquired for lung cancer screening, screening adults with connective tissue disease and first-degree relatives of patients with familial pulmonary fibrosis, assessing baseline symptoms and pulmonary function among those with ILAs, and monitoring ILAs with chest computed tomography every 2–3 years. Conclusions This document presents a comprehensive literature review of ILAs with updates to the Fleischner Society ILA definition, establishes a working ILD definition, and provides evidence-based suggestions for ILA evaluation and management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.030
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.030
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.157

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0300.030
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0030.005
Research integrity0.0090.015
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.476
Teacher spread0.393 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations74
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care MedicineSame topicInterstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisFrench-language works237,207