BE-EARLY: A PHASE 4, PROSPECTIVE, OPEN-LABEL STUDY TO EVALUATE THE IMPACT OF BELIMUMAB ON EARLY (≤ 2 YEARS) SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHMETOSUS IN ADULTS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PV251 / #283 Poster Topic: AS24 - SLE-Treatment Background/Purpose Approximately 40% of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) develop organ damage within the first 5 years of diagnosis due to uncontrolled disease activity and cumulative steroid exposure, impacting quality of life and increasing early mortality risk.[1] Intervention with a disease-modifying biologic such as belimumab (BEL) in the early disease stages might modify the disease course and prevent irreversible organ damage while minimizing the need for glucocorticoids (GCs) or exposure to immunosuppressants (IS). Evidence suggests that BEL induces better responses compared with standard therapy (ST) when used earlier in SLE, especially in patients with minimal or no organ damage or within 2 years of classification.[2,3] However, the use of BEL early in the disease course has been limited in clinical practice, mostly following the failure of ≥ 2 IS. Here, we present the BE-EARLY (BEL in Early SLE) study design, which will evaluate the efficacy and safety of BEL in adult SLE patients with early disease. Methods This Phase 4, prospective, open-label, single-arm, 3-year clinical study (GSK Study 219240; NCT06411249 ) will include approximately 350 participants from 11 countries with active, autoantibody-positive, early SLE (≤ 2 years since diagnosis) with no organ damage and inadequate response to initial ST (with/without a first conventional IS). Key eligibility criteria are shown in Table 1. Participants will receive BEL 200 mg/week subcutaneously as an add-on to initial ST for 52 weeks (Part A), with a long-term extension up to 104 weeks (end of study is the safety follow-up visit after Week 156; Part B). Key primary and secondary endpoints are shown in Table 2. Participants will be required to taper the average oral GC (oGC; prednisone equivalent) dose starting at Week 12 to ≤ 7.5 mg/day by Week 26, and to ≤ 5 mg/day by Week 48 (if the investigator considers the disease is stable and under control on ≤ 7.5 mg/day). No changes in oGC dose are allowed between Weeks 48 and 52. An optional concomitant IS taper may be attempted after the Week 52 visit if the patient maintains Definition Of Remission in SLE (DORIS) criteria for ≥ 6 months. Descriptive summaries will be performed for all endpoints. Table 1. Key eligibility criteria Table 2. Key primary and secondary endpoints Results Currently, 22% of sites are active; the first patient was included in July 2024. The primary endpoint data are expected in 2027. Conclusions This clinical study will investigate the efficacy and safety of BEL in adults with early, active SLE, using relevant disease activity endpoints. The open-label design was selected as several other treatment options are available, and BEL is an approved biological therapy in the population of this study. It is expected that early BEL administration will benefit participants’ short-term outcomes, such as improvements in disease activity, quality of life, and reduction in oGC use, as well as long-term outcomes, including attainment of remission and prevention of organ damage. References: [1.] Urowitz MB. Arthritis Care Res 2012;64:132-7. [2.] Gatto M. Arthritis Rheumatol 2020;72(8):1314-24. [3.] Petri M. Ann Rheum Dis 2022;81:323. Funding: Funded by GSK. Accepted (abstract-only publication): EULAR European Congress of Rheumatology, 12–15 June 2024. Reused with permission. Petri M. Ann Rheum Dis 2024;83:1837. Presented: 26 th Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology Congress, 21–25 August 2024.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".