MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

CONFIRMATION OF EIGHT ENDOTYPES OF LUPUS BASED ON WHOLE BLOOD RNA PROFILES

2025· article· en· W4410512951 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Erika L. Hubbard, Prathyusha Bachali, Amrie C. Grammer, Peter E. Lipsky

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSystemic lupus erythematosusLupus erythematosusWhole bloodImmunologyInternal medicineAntibodyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PV180 / #508 Poster Topic: AS20 - Precision Medicine Background/Purpose We previously described a classification system of persons with SLE based on whole blood (WB) mRNA profiles and a random forest (RF) algorithm to predict individual patient endotypes.[1] Here, we apply this algorithm prospectively in an independent set of patients to validate its use as a staging biomarker. Methods WB from 101 patients participating in 3 clinical trials meeting ACR or SLICC criteria for SLE classification was obtained at baseline, and RNA isolated and sequenced. Gene expression values were used as input to Gene Set Variation Analysis (GSVA) and the RF algorithm was applied using GSVA enrichment scores of 32 informative gene sets as input. Composite scores summarizing gene expression perturbations were assigned to each patient using a ridge logistic regression algorithm. Binary classifiers characterizing patients in the prospective cohort into each endotype were additionally constructed and Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis was employed to explain the contribution of molecular features to the RF algorithmic decision. Results Eight SLE endotypes were identified by the algorithm (Figure 1). Patterns of gene enrichment in the identified endotypes mirrored those found in the previously reported endotypes.[1] Differences in clinical characteristics, including serum complement levels, autoantibody positivity, and the presence of nephritis, were observed between patients in various endotypes. Patients with active, contemporaneous nephritis were disproportionately assigned to the more molecularly perturbed endotypes. Composite scores were significantly, but modestly, inversely correlated with complement but not SLEDAI or anti-dsDNA titer. SHAP analysis revealed specific important features and patterns of features per endotype and per patient contributing to the RF models’ classification decision. Figure 1. Identification of Eight Endotypes Among 101 SLE Patients GSVA enrichment scores of 26 immune/inflammatory modules show the molecular profiles for each of the 101 SLE patients according to endotype membership, which was identified by a random forest algorithm using the enrichment scores. Clinical metadata for each patient (x-axis) was annotated as shown. Heatmap constructed in R v 4.3.3 using the ComplexHeatmap package v. 2.18.0. LN=lupus nephritis; ISN_RPS=International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society. Conclusions The identification of 8 molecular endotypes of lupus based on WB gene expression was validated in an independent dataset of diverse patients. Endotyping SLE patients based on transcriptional profiles can provide important status (presence of nephritis) information and provide novel molecular insights in support of personalized management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Rheumatology→Same topicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research→French-language works237,207→