CONFIRMATION OF EIGHT ENDOTYPES OF LUPUS BASED ON WHOLE BLOOD RNA PROFILES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PV180 / #508 Poster Topic: AS20 - Precision Medicine Background/Purpose We previously described a classification system of persons with SLE based on whole blood (WB) mRNA profiles and a random forest (RF) algorithm to predict individual patient endotypes.[1] Here, we apply this algorithm prospectively in an independent set of patients to validate its use as a staging biomarker. Methods WB from 101 patients participating in 3 clinical trials meeting ACR or SLICC criteria for SLE classification was obtained at baseline, and RNA isolated and sequenced. Gene expression values were used as input to Gene Set Variation Analysis (GSVA) and the RF algorithm was applied using GSVA enrichment scores of 32 informative gene sets as input. Composite scores summarizing gene expression perturbations were assigned to each patient using a ridge logistic regression algorithm. Binary classifiers characterizing patients in the prospective cohort into each endotype were additionally constructed and Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis was employed to explain the contribution of molecular features to the RF algorithmic decision. Results Eight SLE endotypes were identified by the algorithm (Figure 1). Patterns of gene enrichment in the identified endotypes mirrored those found in the previously reported endotypes.[1] Differences in clinical characteristics, including serum complement levels, autoantibody positivity, and the presence of nephritis, were observed between patients in various endotypes. Patients with active, contemporaneous nephritis were disproportionately assigned to the more molecularly perturbed endotypes. Composite scores were significantly, but modestly, inversely correlated with complement but not SLEDAI or anti-dsDNA titer. SHAP analysis revealed specific important features and patterns of features per endotype and per patient contributing to the RF models’ classification decision. Figure 1. Identification of Eight Endotypes Among 101 SLE Patients GSVA enrichment scores of 26 immune/inflammatory modules show the molecular profiles for each of the 101 SLE patients according to endotype membership, which was identified by a random forest algorithm using the enrichment scores. Clinical metadata for each patient (x-axis) was annotated as shown. Heatmap constructed in R v 4.3.3 using the ComplexHeatmap package v. 2.18.0. LN=lupus nephritis; ISN_RPS=International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society. Conclusions The identification of 8 molecular endotypes of lupus based on WB gene expression was validated in an independent dataset of diverse patients. Endotyping SLE patients based on transcriptional profiles can provide important status (presence of nephritis) information and provide novel molecular insights in support of personalized management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".