MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4410512971 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.2025-0390.o025

RESULTS FROM THE REGENCY TRIAL ASSESSING EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF OBINUTUZUMAB IN ACTIVE LUPUS NEPHRITIS

2025· article· en· W4410512971 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Brad H. Rovin, Richard Furie, Jay Garg, Mittermayer B. Santiago, Gustavo Aroca, Harini Raghu, Bongin Yoo, Elsa Martins, Himanshi Sehgal, Theodore A. Omachi, Thomas H. Schindler, William F. Pendergraft, Ana Malvar

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Canadian institutionsRoche (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineObinutuzumabLupus nephritisInternal medicineRituximabLymphomaDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O025 / #750 Topic: AS15 - Lupus Nephritis-Clinical Late-Breaking Abstract ABSTRACT CONCURRENT SESSION 04: ADVANCING LUPUS THERAPIES AND INSIGHTS 22-05-2025 1:40 PM - 2:40 PM Background/Purpose Obinutuzumab, a humanized type II anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, is approved for B cell malignancies. In the Phase II NOBILITY trial of patients with active lupus nephritis (LN; NCT02550652 ), study participants receiving obinutuzumab in addition to standard therapy were significantly more likely to achieve complete renal response than those receiving placebo in addition to standard therapy. The results of the Phase III REGENCY trial ( NCT04221477 ), performed to verify NOBILITY, are presented here. Methods REGENCY, a Phase III, double-blind placebo-controlled trial, randomized adults with biopsy-proven active proliferative LN 1:1 to placebo or one of 2 intravenous obinutuzumab dosing schedules (1000 mg: Day 1, Weeks 2, 24, 26, ±50 and 52) in addition to standard therapy. The primary endpoint was complete renal response (CRR, defined as urine protein-to-creatinine ratio [UPCR] <0.5 g/g, estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] ≥85% of baseline and no intercurrent events of rescue therapy, treatment failure, death or early study withdrawal) at Week 76 and assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Key secondary endpoints included CRR at Week 76 with successful prednisone taper to ≤7.5 mg/day between Weeks 64 and 76, and UPCR <0.8 g/g at Week 76 with no intercurrent events, change in eGFR from baseline to Week 76 and renal-related events or death through Week 76. Incidence and severity of adverse events through Week 76 were compiled. Results Of 271 patients randomized, 135 were randomized to obinutuzumab and 136 to placebo. At Week 76, 46.4% of patients in the obinutuzumab group and 33.1% in the placebo group achieved CRR (adjusted difference, 13.4%; 95% CI, 2.0% to 24.8%; P =0.0232). More patients in the obinutuzumab group achieved CRR at Week 76 with successful prednisone taper (42.7% vs 30.9%, adjusted difference, 11.9%; 95% CI, 0.6% to 23.2%; P =0.0421) and a proteinuric response (UPCR <0.8 g/g) with no intercurrent events at Week 76 (55.5% vs 41.9%; adjusted difference, 13.7%; 95% CI, 2.0% to 25.4%; P =0.0227). Numerical changes in eGFR from baseline to Week 76 favored obinutuzumab compared with placebo, and fewer patients in the obinutuzumab group experienced the composite outcome of death or renal-related events through Week 76. Prespecified subgroup analyses demonstrated numerically greater CRR rates with obinutuzumab in patients with potentially more active disease at enrollment, such as those with Class IV LN, concomitant class V disease, baseline UPCR ≥3 g/g or greater baseline serologic activity. No new safety signals were observed based on the established safety profile of obinutuzumab in oncology indications. More coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) events were observed in the obinutuzumab group, which primarily occurred during the acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. There were 3 deaths in the obinutuzumab group and 1 in the placebo group, which were mainly complications of COVID-19. Conclusions Obinutuzumab plus standard therapy was more effective than placebo plus standard therapy for achieving CRR, a clinically meaningful surrogate of kidney function, in patients with LN, while exhibiting an acceptable safety profile.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Rheumatology→Same topicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research→French-language works237,207→