MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

PREDICTORS OF MECHANICAL VENTILATION IN SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS PATIENTS WITH CORONAVIRUS DISEASE 2019: INSIGHTS FROM NATIONAL INPATIENT DATA

2025· article· en· W4410513099 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Godbless Ajenaghughrure, Sila Mateo Faxas, Tochukwu Ikpeze

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLong-Term Effects of COVID-19
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMechanical ventilationCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Systemic diseaseDiseaseSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Intensive care medicineLupus erythematosus2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSystemic lupus erythematosusInternal medicineImmunologyVirologyInfectious disease (medical specialty)AntibodyOutbreak

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PV052 / #534 Poster Topic: AS06 - Comorbidities Background/Purpose Mechanical ventilation represents a critical outcome in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). We aimed to identify specific risk factors and predictors of mechanical ventilation in this population using nationally representative data. Methods Analyzing the 2021 National Inpatient Sample, we identified adult SLE patients with COVID-19 (ICD-10 code M32). The primary outcome was mechanical ventilation. Using survey-weighted logistic regression, we calculated adjusted odds ratios (aOR) for ventilation risk, controlling for demographics, comorbidities, and clinical factors. Results Among 170,085 SLE patients, 12,710 (7.47%) had COVID-19. The mechanical ventilation rate was significantly higher in COVID-19 patients vs non-COVID-19 (11.25% vs 2.76%, p < 0.001). After adjustment, COVID-19 remained strongly associated with ventilation risk (aOR 4.87, 95% CI 4.22-5.62, p < 0.001). Demographic analysis revealed higher ventilation rates in males vs females (11.76% vs 8.82%, aOR 1.06, 95% CI 0.79-1.12, p = 0.472) and African American vs Caucasian patients (13.3% vs 9.8%, aOR 1.17, 95% CI 1.00-1.37, p = 0.038). Comorbidity burden strongly predicted ventilation need: severe vs mild Elixhauser index (41.03% vs 9.87%, aOR 11.80, 95% CI 8.06-17.29, p < 0.001). Notable comorbidity associations included obesity (31.94% vs 22.23%, aOR 1.21, 95% CI 1.10-1.37, p < 0.001), diabetes (30.02% vs 23.54%, aOR 1.18, 95% CI 1.09-1.28, p < 0.001), and hypertension (34.70% vs 30.56%, aOR 0.60, 95% CI 0.51-0.70, p < 0.001). Acute complications significantly associated with ventilation included acute kidney injury (29.31% vs 21.38%, aOR 2.47, 95% CI 2.31-2.65, p < 0.001) and cardiac arrest (2.64% vs 0.92%, aOR 2.98, 95% CI 2.28-3.90, p < 0.001). Conclusions This analysis identifies key predictors of mechanical ventilation in SLE patients with COVID-19, highlighting the complex interplay between demographics, comorbidities, and acute complications. The nearly 5-fold increased risk of ventilation in COVID-19 patients, along with identified risk factors, can inform clinical decision making and resource allocation for this high-risk population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Rheumatology→Same topicLong-Term Effects of COVID-19→French-language works237,207→