MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

SAFETY, TOLERABILITY, PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS IN HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS OF VENT-03, A NOVEL CGAS INHIBITOR FOR THE TREATMENT OF SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS

2025· article· en· W4410513115 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xavier Valencia, Kelly A. Pike, L. Warner, Conrad Winters, Jeanne W. Stewart, Michele Bronson, Ramsay E. Beveridge, Patrick Cyr, Nadine Fradet, Amadine Chefson, Ofer Spiegelstein

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePharmacodynamicsPharmacokineticsTolerabilityPharmacologySystemic lupus erythematosusLupus erythematosusAdverse effectInternal medicineImmunologyAntibody

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PV073 / #286 Poster Topic: AS09 - Emerging Approaches in SLE Management Background/Purpose The detection of foreign DNA by the innate immune system is a vital component of the host response to pathogens. In mammalian cells, this task is performed in large part by cyclic GMP-AMP synthase (cGAS). Although the indiscriminate detection of DNA by cGAS ensures the detection of almost all pathogens, it can also trigger autoinflammation in response to the aberrant accumulation of self-DNA, central to the immunopathology of multiple diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), systemic sclerosis, dermatomyositis, and several forms of cardiomyopathies. cGAS is therefore a drug target with a broad therapeutic potential across autoimmune disorders. VENT-03 is a potent, selective and orally available cGAS inhibitor discovered by Ventus Therapeutics using a proprietary platform for identifying novel small molecule therapeutics (ReSOLVE TM ). VENT-03 is the first cGAS inhibitor to be tested in humans and herein we describe its safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in healthy volunteers. Methods 72 healthy male and female volunteers received single ascending oral doses (SAD) of VENT-03 or placebo up to 2000 mg, or multiple ascending doses (MAD) up to 900 mg administered once daily (QD) for 10 days. Each SAD and MAD cohort included 8 participants, of which 6 received VENT-03 and 2 received placebo in a double-blind manner. Volunteers were monitored for adverse events, clinical laboratory parameters, ECG and vital signs. Serial blood samples were taken to characterize the pharmacokinetics of VENT-03, and pharmacodynamics was assessed using a novel proprietary whole blood assay. Results There were no deaths or serious adverse effects during the trial. VENT-03 was safe and well-tolerated across all tested SAD and MAD dose levels. There were no significant changes in clinical laboratory parameters, ECG or vital signs. There were no dose-related adverse effects, and the observed adverse effects were mild, transient and easily managed. Absorption of VENT-03 in a fasted state was rapid with peak plasma concentrations appearing 4-6 hours post dose. Exposure increased with ascending doses, and the pharmacokinetic profile of VENT-03 supports a QD dosing regimen. Pharmacokinetic steady state is reached in approximately 7 days with significant accumulation in plasma. Administration of VENT-03 with food delayed the time of peak plasma levels but did not significantly affect the overall exposure. VENT-03 demonstrated robust target engagement, and plasma levels exceed what is required to fully inhibit the activity of cGAS in patients. Conclusions VENT-03 was safe and well-tolerated in healthy volunteers, demonstrating a favorable pharmacokinetic profile and robust target engagement. The efficacy of VENT-03 in SLE patients with active cutaneous manifestations will be evaluated in an upcoming Phase 2a study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Rheumatology→Same topicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research→French-language works237,207→