MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

CHILDHOOD-ONSET SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS – SINGLE CENTER’S 10-YEAR EXPERIENCE

2025· article· en· W4410513134 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Joanna Lipińska, Julia Kulesza, Patrycja Urbanska, Elżbieta Smolewska

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSingle CenterSystemic diseaseLupus erythematosusPediatricsImmunopathologyDermatologySurgeryInternal medicineImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PV165 / #571 Poster Topic: AS18 - Pediatric SLE Background/Purpose Childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE) is a rare, chronic autoimmune multisystem inflammatory disease that manifests before the age of 16 years. The course of the disease in children is more severe than in adults. The clinical presentation of cSLE is multifaceted, most commonly including constitutional, hematological, cutaneous, renal, and neuropsychiatric symptoms. The aim of the study was to characterize cSLE cohort in single center in Poland in years: 2014-2024. Methods A total of 35 Caucasian children (27 girls, 8 boys) diagnosed with cSLE according to SLICC 2012 criteria in Department of Pediatric Cardiology and Rheumatology Medical University of Lodz, Poland, were included in the retrospective analysis. Clinical features, laboratory and imaging test, as well as, kidney biopsy if necessary and treatment strategies were analyzed. Results The female-to-male ratio was 3.37:1. The median age at diagnosis was 14 years (7.5 to 18). The most common clinical symptoms were photosensitivity/malar rash/ (15/35 – 42.8%), oral ulcers (11/35 – 31.4%) and arthritis (9/35 – 25.7%) (Table 1). The severe course of cSLE was observed in 18/35 (51.4%) children. Central nervous system was affected in 14/35 (40%) children – 5 (14.3%) complained of headaches, 2 (5.7%) - depression, 2 (5.7%) – epilepsy. Proteinuria (>500 mg/24h) associated with histopathological lupus nephritis (3- stage IV, 1- stage - II) was observed in 4/35 (11.4%) patients. In 9/35 (25.7%) children leukopenia was observed, 5 /35 (14.3%) children have anemia and the same number thrombocytopenia. Antinuclear antibodies were positive (titer >1:80) in all children with cSLE, and above 1:320 in 27/35 (77.1%) patients. Fourteen (40%) children had dsDNA antibodies; 2/35 (5.7%) patients with lupus nephritis were anti-dsDNA positive. Anti-phospholipid antibodies were detected in 8/35 (22.8%) children, including 3 patients with neuropsychiatric manifestations, and 1 child with neuropsychiatric symptoms had also anti-Sm antibodies (Table 2). Low total activity of compliment (CH50) was found in 14/35 (40%) patients with cSLE. Six patients had Raynaud symptom and only 3/35 (8.6%) had microangiopathy confirmed by capillaroscopy. All the patients with cSLE were treated with hydroxychloroquine and supplemented with vitamin D. Twenty-three children (65.7%) required systemic corticosteroids, included 13/35 (37.1%) patients who received methylprednisolone intra venous pulses followed by oral prednisone. Seven children (20%) were treated with IVIG. Mycophenolane mophetyl was used in 8/35 (22.8%) cases, methotrexate - in 4/35 (11.4%). The observed complications were related to the prolonged use of glucocorticoids - cushingoid symptoms, such as obesity and fat tissue redistribution and stretch marks. Table 1. Clinical symptoms observed in study group of children with cSLE. Table 2. Immunological markers in study group of children with cSLE. Conclusions Our study confirms that the course of cSLE is severe. Neuropsychiatric symptoms are common in children population. Lupus nephritis requires the administration of steroids, which can be associated with adverse effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Rheumatology→Same topicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research→French-language works237,207→