MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4410513958 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2025-0051

Corrected non-relativistic bound state solutions in <i>D</i>-dimensional Euclidean space for the Hua potential

2025· article· en· W4410513958 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
A. Khodja, M. Ferdjaoui

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsEuclidean geometryBound stateMathematical physicsEuclidean spaceSpace (punctuation)State (computer science)Theoretical physicsQuantum mechanicsClassical mechanicsMathematical analysisGeometryAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, we present a rigorous and complete non-relativistic treatment of the problem of a diatomic molecule which moves under the Hua potential in a D-dimensional Euclidean space. The radial Green’s function associated with this potential is constructed within the framework of the Feynman path integral. Different cases of this potential which are distinguished by the values of the deformation parameter q are considered separately. For [Formula: see text] q < 1 and r ∈ ] r0, +∞[, we adopt an appropriate Pekeris-type approximation for the centrifugal potential term to obtain the approximate spectrum of bound states lD ≠ 0. Some numerical results of the energy levels of certain diatomic molecules are calculated by using the correct minimum value of the deformation parameter q given by [Formula: see text]. For q < 0 or [Formula: see text], the problem is solvable only in a three-dimensional space. In both cases, the energy quantization condition is a transcendental equation that can be solved numerically. In the limit [Formula: see text], the energy spectrum and the corresponding wave functions of the radial Morse potential are regained.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Physics→Same topicBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics→French-language works237,207→