MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410520934 · doi:10.7759/cureus.84458

A Survey-Based Study Examining Exercise in Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS) Patients

2025· article· en· W4410520934 on OpenAlexaff
Mackaleigh Levine, Devora Shapiro, Anna Hayburn, C. A. Cantrell, Robert Wilson

Bibliographic record

VenueCureus · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
Canadian institutionsHeritage College
FundersCleveland Clinic
KeywordsMedicinePostural Orthostatic Tachycardia SyndromeOrthostatic vital signsPhysical therapyTachycardiaPhysical medicine and rehabilitationCardiologyInternal medicineBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To better understand why some postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) patients incorporate exercise regularly into their treatment and what barriers challenge others. BACKGROUND: POTS is a chronic autonomic condition in which patients experience orthostatic intolerance and abnormal tachycardia. Exercise is often recommended as a self-care modification, but many POTS patients face barriers to optimizing exercise. DESIGN/METHODS: We sent an institutional review board-approved survey via the patient e-messenger (MyChart, Epic Systems, Verona, WI) to 421 patients who participated in a shared medical appointment (SMA) by Zoom (Zoom Video Communications, San Jose, CA) within our tertiary care center between March 2022 and October 2022. The survey gathered data for the following variables: demographics, gender, body identity, symptoms that interfere with exercise, exercise tolerance, exercise prescription, attitude toward exercise, and exercise resource accessibility. RESULTS: Of the 421 patients messaged through MyChart, 260-286 (61.75%-67.93%) responses were formally submitted per question. A total of 221/283 (78.09%) patients have had exercise recommended as a lifestyle modification; 220/286 (76.92%) patients exercised regularly before experiencing POTS symptoms; 167/271 (61.62%) patients were unsatisfied with their exercise regimen; 111/271 (40.95%) felt like others are critical of how much they exercise; 157/267 (58.80%) patients did not feel proud of how their body looks; 116/265 (43.77%) said they are ashamed of their body; 137/265 (51.69%) patients said exercise makes them feel worse; 176/266 (66.16%) patients wanted to stop exercising due to excessive sweating; 220/267 (82.39%) patients experienced dizziness while exercising; 159/266 (59.77%) patients experienced nausea while exercising. CONCLUSION: Most patients include exercise in their POTS treatment plan, and have a background in exercise before being diagnosed. However, many patients have negative self-identity and body image post diagnosis and experience symptoms while exercising that create barriers to physical activity. Managing exercise barriers for POTS patients in care delivery could improve exercise outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.715

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCureusSame topicCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersFrench-language works237,207