Geochronology, Geochemistry and Sr‐Nd‐Pb Isotopes of the Early–Middle Jurassic Highly Fractionated Granites in Southern Jiangxi, and their Implications for the Rare‐Earth Mineralization: Examples from the Muzishan, Xiahu, and Zudong Deposits
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The pervasively distributed granitoids in South China contributed greatly to regional polymetallic mineralization, including tungsten, tin, copper, gold, rare metals, and rare earth elements (REEs). To ascertain the dynamic backgrounds, rock types and genesis of the parent rocks related to the Early–Middle Jurassic ionic rare earth mineralization, typical deposits at Muzishan, Xiahu, and Zudong were investigated by conducting petrographic, geochronologic, whole‐rock geochemical, and Sr‐Nd‐Pb isotope analyses, which found that the parent rocks from the Muzishan deposit were the A1‐type K‐feldspar granite (~195 Ma), from the Zudong deposit were the A2‐type monzogranite (~171 Ma), and from the Xiahu deposit were the I‐type monzogranite (~167 Ma). All the three granitic rocks underwent different degrees of fractionation, with the Xiahu granite experiencing the highest degree, followed by the Zudong granite, and the Muzishan granite undergoing the lowest degree. The Muzishan granite was concluded to be formed under an intraplate extensional tectonic regime influenced by the hotspots or the mantle plume. The Zudong granite was formed in a post‐arc extensional setting related to subduction–collision–rollback of the paleo‐Pacific Plate, which caused upwelling of the asthenosphere, thinning of the lithosphere, and partial melting of crustal materials. The Xiahu granite was generated under a transitional tectonic setting of extension and compression, triggered by delamination and rollback of the paleo‐Pacific Plate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".