MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410534133 · doi:10.70359/bhc2021v046p108

A wave of women chemists: Mary Elvira Weeks and her University of Kansas colleagues

2021· article· en· W4410534133 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Kathleen L. Neeley, James Neeley

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin for the history of chemistry · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicHistory and advancements in chemistry
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMemorial University of NewfoundlandWayne State University
KeywordsGerontologyPsychologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Early Years Gottlieb (1900Gottlieb ( -1988) ) was an accidental chemist.Starting out, she had no particular career in mind; she simply wanted to go to college.Arriving at the University of Kansas in 1918, the possibilities she found were, in her words, "like walking into a candy store … I majored in everything my freshman year" (14).She was born on November 23, 1900, in Pleasanton, Kansas, south of Kansas City, the second of six children in the only Jewish family in town.Her immigrant parents worked at and later owned a dry goods store there.Her father "wanted us all to go to college," she said.Pleasanton High School, where Gottlieb was valedictorian in 1918, did not teach chemistry.At the University of Kansas, where she enrolled that fall, the course offerings were dazzling (15): I was so overwhelmed … that I chose the one course that would take the longest time to conquer: an M.D.So I began to take prerequisites for the MD, such as bacteriology, chemistry, other sciences.But then I thought that with such a large family I should get something more specific: chemistry and bacteriology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.983
Threshold uncertainty score0.101

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0170.006
Scholarly communication0.0080.005
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0040.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.168 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin for the history of chemistrySame topicHistory and advancements in chemistryFrench-language works237,207