197 The apparent utilization of DL-methionine and the hydroxyl-analog of methionine for nitrogen retention of lactating sows
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Eighty-seven sows [average parity: 1.49±0.50; body weight on lactation day 9: 195.5±14.9 kg] were recruited to evaluate the apparent utilization of dietary Met sources for N retention during lactation. On day 9 of lactation, sows were assigned to one of six dietary treatments (n=~15): [1] 70% of estimated standardized ileal digestible (SID) methionine + cysteine (Met+Cys) requirements provided via whole-protein sources (0.34% SID Met+Cys), [2] and [3] 80 and 90% SID Met+Cys requirements supplied by DL-methionine (DL-MET), [4] and [5] 80 and 90% SID Met+Cys requirements supplied by the hydroxy-analog of methionine (HMTBa; equimolar), or [6] 110% SID Met+Cys requirements supplied by whole-protein sources and DL-methionine (CON). In all diets, no crystalline cysteine was included. All other indispensable amino acids were supplied at estimated requirements. Sows received dietary treatments between days 10 and 20 (weaning) of lactation, and feed was offered according to a standard feeding curve. Litters were standardized to 13±2 pigs within 48 h of farrowing. A N-balance was conducted between days 16 and 19±2 (peak) of lactation using total urine collection and fecal grab sampling. Milk N output (g/d) was calculated using estimated milk yield based on litter growth rate and size and analyzed milk N concentration. Contrast statements were used to assess linear effects of increasing dietary Met within source, and all treatments were compared to CON via a Dunnett test. Dietary Met source did not influence sow average daily feed intake or body weight and back fat thickness changes between days 9 and 20 of lactation, but piglet average daily gain increased as dietary SID Met content increased for both DL-MET (224 to 244±7 g/d; P<0.05) and HMTBa (224 to 251±9 g/d; P<0.05), with only 90% HMTBa not different from CON (277±11 g/d). During the N balance period, sow N intake tended to increase with SID Met for both DL-MET (162.4 to 170.3±5.4 g/d; P=0.098) and HMTBa (162.4 to 169.8±4.2 g/d; P=0.075). Whole-body N retention (N intake – N output in urine and feces) increased with increasing SID Met content for both DL-MET (100.5 to 112.1±3.7 g/d; P<0.05) and HMTBa (100.5 to 110.8±4.5 g/d; P<0.05), but all were less than CON (123.5±4.3 g/d; P<0.05). The N output in milk increased with SID Met for both DL-MET (69.3 to 87.7±3.7 g/d; P<0.05) and HMTBa (69.3 to 86.0±4.7 g/d; P<0.05), but only the 70% diet was less than CON (94.2±4.3 g/d; P<0.05). Neither dietary Met source nor dose influenced maternal N retention (overall average 25.5±6.4 g/d) or apparent N utilization efficiency (N retention/N intake × 100; overall average 65.2±4.1%). Therefore, both DL-Met and HMTBa were used effectively to improve N utilization for milk production during peak lactation when SID Met+Cys was provided below estimated requirements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".