MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4410535973 · doi:10.1093/jas/skaf102.140

110 Effect of reducing dietary acid-binding capacity on nutrient digestibility in ileal-cannulated weaned pigs

2025· article· en· W4410535973 on OpenAlexaff
Lingjun Zhu, Lifang Wang, Jose Landero, Jon R Bergstrom, Malachy Young, R. T. Zijlstra

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNutrientAnimal scienceFood scienceChemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Piglets at weaning secrete insufficient gastric acid, leading to high gastric pH that may impede protein digestion and increase risks for bacterial infections. Reducing dietary acid-binding capacity (ABC) may alleviate this issue. Previously, growth performance and feces consistency were better in weaned pigs fed low-ZnO, low-ABC diet than fed low-ZnO, high-ABC diet. However, the effects of supplementing additional acidifiers to diets with different initial ABC remains unclear. In the present study, high- vs. low-ABC diets (calculated initial ABC4: 364 vs. 256 mEq H+/kg) were either supplemented or not with additional 0.75% organic acids in a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement to evaluate the effects of initial ABC and additional acidifiers on apparent ileal digestibility (AID) of crude protein (CP) and amino acids (AA), and apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of dry matter (DM) and gross energy (GE) in weaned pigs. Low-ABC diets were formulated using the following changes from high-ABC diets: replacing limestone with Ca formate, replacing soy protein concentrate with low-mineral soy protein concentrate, and adding a cocktail of organic acids (formic and benzoic acids). The additional 0.75% acidifiers were 0.25% formic acid, 0.25% benzoic acid, and 0.25% calcium formate. Eight ileal-cannulated barrows (initial body weight, 15 kg) were fed the 4 test diets in a replicated 4 × 4 Latin square over four 9-day periods. The AID, ATTD, digestible energy (DE) and calculated net energy (NE) values were analyzed using PROC GLIMMIX of SAS. The low-ABC diets had greater (P = 0.002) AID of CP than the high-ABC diets (86.1 vs. 85.1%). The AID of Lys, Leu, Ile, Phe, and Trp, the ATTD of DM and GE, and DE value were also greater (P < 0.05) than the high-ABC diets. The additional acidifiers interacted (P = 0.049) with the initial ABC for calculated NE value so that additional acidifiers tended to increase (P = 0.16) NE for the high-ABC diet by 35 kcal/kg but did not for the low-ABC diet. In conclusion, reducing dietary ABC increased ileal digestibility of protein and some essential amino acids, supporting that reducing dietary ABC value enhances protein and AA digestion in weaned pigs. Finally, supplementing additional acidifiers to high-ABC diets may increase diet NE value in young pigs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal Science→Same topicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology→French-language works237,207→