MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410536250 · doi:10.1093/jas/skaf102.167

166 Effects of excess zinc in drinking water of weaned piglets in a natural viral infection model

2025· article· en· W4410536250 on OpenAlexaffabout
L. Cloutier, Aude Simongiovanni, Carl A. Gagnon, Marie-Pierre Létourneau-Montminy

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicTrace Elements in Health
Canadian institutionsCentre de Développement du Porc du QuébecUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZincAnimal scienceBiologyVirologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) causes significant losses in the Canadian swine industry. Zinc oxide is commonly used to support gut health and the immune system in animals post-weaning, but its digestibility is limited, and its widespread use causes environmental issues. In response to new regulations limiting the use of zinc oxide, finding alternatives has become crucial. This study aimed to test the effect of a zinc-lysine complex offered in water using a natural disease challenge model (NDCM). The study was conducted on five groups of 60 weaned piglets that were monitored to evaluate the effect of zinc-lysine in water. Each group was divided into four pens of 15 piglets, with one control group and two groups receiving 500 ppm (ZnH) and 1000 ppm (ZnVH) of zinc-lysine in water. Treatments lasted 29 days. Feed and water intake were measured. All piglets received conventional feed without additional Zn as a growth factor. Manual weighing was conducted on days 0, 15, 29, and at the end of the nursery phase, with weekly health scores assigned until the end of nursery. Blood samples were also taken on days 15 and 29 from 8 piglets per pen. Statistical analyses were performed using Minitab’s mixed procedure with treatment and sex as fixed effects and group as a random effect. For the 0-29 day period, average daily feed intake was not influenced by treatments. Average daily gain was lower for ZnVH (192 g/day; P=0.005) compared to the control (222 g/day) and ZnH (240 g/day), which did not differ statistically. Feed conversion was higher for ZnVH (1.86) compared to ZnH (1.44; P=0.018), with the control being intermediate (1.67). On day 29, the weight of animals in the ZnH group (13.6 kg) was higher than ZnVH (11.6 kg; P=0.007), with the control group being intermediate (12.9 kg). On days 7 (P=0.045), 15 (P=0.018), and 29 (P=0.044), health scores deteriorated for ZnVH compared to ZnH, which had the best score and did not differ from the control. Finally, on day 29, plasma zinc levels for the ZnVH treatment (2.10 ppm) were higher than for the control (0.613 ppm) and ZnH (1.36 ppm; P< 0.05). The results of the study show that adding zinc-lysine to water can benefit weaned piglets infected with the PRRS virus. However, an excess of zinc appears to lead to toxic effects, compromising piglet health and growth performance. This study shows that zinc-lysine may be an effective alternative to zinc oxide, but the optimal dose of Zn still needs to be fine-tune.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicTrace Elements in HealthFrench-language works237,207