An exploratory study combining Virtual Reality and Semantic Web for life science research using Graph2VR
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We previously described Graph2VR, a prototype that enables researchers to use virtual reality (VR) to explore and navigate through Linked Data graphs using SPARQL queries (see https://doi.org/10.1093/database/baae008). Here we evaluate the use of Graph2VR in three realistic life science use cases. The first use case visualizes metadata from large-scale multi-center cohort studies across Europe and Canada via the EUCAN Connect catalogue. The second use case involves a set of genomic data from synthetic rare disease patients, which was processed through the Variant Interpretation Pipeline and then converted into Resource Description Format for visualization. The third use case involves enriching a graph with additional information, in this case, the Dutch Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical code Ontology with the DrugID from Drugbank. These examples collectively showcase Graph2VR's potential for data exploration and enrichment, as well as some of its limitations. We conclude that the endless three-dimensional space provided by VR indeed shows much potential for the navigation of very large knowledge graphs, and we provide recommendations for data preparation and VR tooling moving forward. Database URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/database/baaf008.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.022 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".