CBT-based self-help guided by a lay provider for generalized anxiety in older adults: A randomized controlled trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Treatments for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) that circumvent the barriers to accessing mental health care in older adults are needed. The main goal of this multisite randomized controlled trial was to evaluate the efficacy of CBT-based self-help guided by a lay provider (LP) for generalized anxiety (i.e., threshold or subthreshold GAD) in older adults. Participants (≥ 60 years) were block randomized based on diagnosis to an experimental (n = 75) or wait-list control group (n = 75). Experimental group participants used a manual presenting CBT-based readings and exercises and received brief weekly support calls by LPs. Groups were similar in terms of sociodemographic characteristics and initially did not differ significantly on outcomes. At post-treatment, the experimental group showed greater improvement across both primary outcomes (i.e., worry tendency, p < .0001, Standardized mean difference [SMD] = -1.5971, and GAD severity, p < .0001, SMD = -1.1639) and most additional outcomes (e.g., targeted psychological vulnerabilities, depressive symptoms, sleep difficulties, and GAD diagnosis) with small to large effect sizes (SMD = -0.4358 to -1.5402). The experimental group also showed maintenance of treatment effects or other improvements at 6- and 12-month follow-up. Participants in the control group who completed the treatment after their waiting period also improved on worry tendency (SMD = -1.2477) and GAD severity (SMD = -0.8443) and most of the other variables (SMD = -0.3728 to -1.0154). Results demonstrate that self-help guided by a LP is effective for treating GAD in older adults and that the improvements are sustained after treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".