A multi-kingdom genetic barcoding system for precise clone isolation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cell-tagging strategies with DNA barcodes have enabled the analysis of clone size dynamics and clone-restricted transcriptomic landscapes in heterogeneous populations. However, isolating a target clone that displays a specific phenotype from a complex population remains challenging. Here we present a multi-kingdom genetic barcoding system, CloneSelect, which enables a target cell clone to be triggered to express a reporter gene for isolation through barcode-specific CRISPR base editing. In CloneSelect, cells are first stably tagged with DNA barcodes and propagated so that their subpopulation can be subjected to a given experiment. A clone that shows a phenotype or genotype of interest at a given time can then be isolated from the initial or subsequent cell pools stored during the experiment using CRISPR base editing. CloneSelect is scalable and compatible with single-cell RNA sequencing. We demonstrate the versatility of CloneSelect in human embryonic kidney 293T cells, mouse embryonic stem cells, human pluripotent stem cells, yeast cells and bacterial cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".