MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410550939 · doi:10.37602/ijrehc.2025.6316

BUILDING HEALTHY HABITS: AN EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM TO OVERCOME CHILDHOOD OBESITY

2025· article· en· W4410550939 on OpenAlexaff
Eleni Kolokouri

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Research in Education Humanities and Commerce · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Canadian institutionsEducation and Early Childhood Development
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChildhood obesityObesityGerontologyPsychologyMedical educationEnvironmental healthMedicineOverweight

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Obesity is a complex global health issue that impacts individuals across all age groups, with childhood obesity emerging as a critical concern due to its long-term health consequences. This paper presents an educational program designed to prevent childhood obesity by promoting healthy habits from the early years. Designed within the sociocultural framework of Activity Theory, the program adopts a holistic approach, integrating nutrition, physical activity, emotional well-being, and social development. It emphasizes experiential, participatory learning and encourages collaboration between school, families, local authorities, and communities. By connecting learning with real-life sociocultural environments, the program empowers young children to make informed choices about healthy habits both at school and at home. The program relates to specific Sustainable Development Goals, such as good health, quality education, clean water, and sustainable communities. Furthermore, the initiative seeks to equip educators, caregivers, and parents with practical tools to support consistent health practices. All in all, the program fosters a positive, developmentally appropriate learning experience that encourages a lifelong commitment to healthy living and ensures a smooth, supportive transition through early educational stages. This approach offers a holistic educational experience that goes beyond the teaching content and extends to social, emotional and ethical dimensions of learning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.414
Threshold uncertainty score0.421

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.462
Teacher spread0.396 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Research in Education Humanities and CommerceSame topicObesity, Physical Activity, DietFrench-language works237,207