MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4410561619 · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095684

The effect of topical TRanexamic Acid versus placebo on acute postoperative pain following Distal Radius fracture fixation: protocol for a randomised controlled trial at a quaternary care hand surgery centre – The TRADR study

2025· article· en· W4410561619 on OpenAlexaff
Darius L. Lameire, Atefeh Noori, Aazad Abbas, Jonathan Persitz, Heather L. Baltzer, Emily Collett, Christian Veillette, Andrea Chan, Ryan Paul

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood transfusion and management
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTranexamic acidPlaceboAnesthesiaRandomized controlled trialSurgeryInternal fixationVisual analogue scaleSalineEmergency department

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative pain management is a major concern for patients undergoing distal radius open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). Inadequate pain control negatively impacts patient's satisfaction and may increase opioid use. Topical tranexamic acid (TXA) has been demonstrated as an effective intervention that reduced acute postoperative pain in total knee arthroplasty. There is no study evaluating the effects of TXA on acute postoperative pain for distal radius ORIF. This study aims to evaluate the effect of topical TXA administration during isolated distal radius ORIF on early postoperative pain. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The effect of topical TRanexamic Acid versus placebo on acute postoperative pain following Distal Radius fracture fixation (TRADR) study is a randomised controlled double-blinded trial that will enrol 90 patients, 18 years of age or older, undergoing volar open reduction internal fixation. Patients will be randomly assigned to topical TXA versus topical saline (placebo) in a 1:1 ratio. The surgeon at the time of surgical closure after standard distal radius fixation will apply either 1 g of topical TXA (100 mg/mL; treatment group) or 10 mL of saline (control group) to the wound and let it sit for 5 min. Surgeons, patients, and outcome assessors will be blinded to the treatment group. The primary outcome is acute postsurgical pain as measured by the visual analogue scale (VAS). Pain outcomes will be between postoperative days 0 to 7, and at 2 and 6 weeks postsurgery. The secondary outcomes include opioid usage, unscheduled emergency visits, wrist swelling and adverse events. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the University Health Network Research Ethics Board (REB 23-5708). The results of this trial will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and presented at related conferences. The principal investigator will communicate the results with patients who have indicated an interest in knowing the results. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT06384456, April 26, 2024; Pre-enrolment. PROTOCOL VERSION: Version 2.0: August 26, 2024.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.028
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.030
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.176

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0280.030
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0060.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0140.006
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0080.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0530.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.356 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJ Open→Same topicBlood transfusion and management→French-language works237,207→