Understanding Trauma in Migration: A Scoping Review of How Trauma is Conceptualized in Literature on West Asian Young Women in Western Contexts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives: Trauma in migration is shaped by individual, social, and structural factors. Using an intersectional lens, this scoping review examines how trauma (i.e., as defined by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; SAMHSA, 2014) is conceptualized in literature on young West Asian women in Western contexts. Given large-scale migration form West Asia over the past two decades, understanding these definitions is key to identifying gaps and informing resilience and recovery efforts. Methods: Using Arksey and O'Malley’s (2005) five-stage framework, a scoping review was conducted. From 424 articles (post-duplicates), 112 were screened, and 15 met the inclusion criteria for final analysis. Results: Trauma in migration is mainly defined as exposure to life-threatening events like war, persecution, or refugee camp conditions. Its impact is shaped by pre-existing (e.g., age, gender) and situational (e.g., discrimination, cultural dislocation) factors. Effects are typically framed clinically (e.g., post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, anxiety, and somatization). Conclusions: Trauma is often framed as isolated events, with little attention to ongoing, complex experiences. Lived experiences and broader impacts are overlooked, with a reliance on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) and International Classification of Diseases (ICD) frameworks. Intersectionality and trauma specific to young West Asian migrant women is rarely addressed across all three Es of trauma: Event, Experience, and Effect. Recovery strategies lack tangible actions. Implications: Future research could explore trauma’s complex nature. Centering the lived experiences of young West Asian migrant women through intersectional and mixed-methods approaches is essential. Policies must be trauma-informed, gender- and age-responsive, and address post-migration stressors. Interventions should be co-designed with the target population, culturally grounded, and attuned to systemic and relational dimensions of trauma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".