MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410565377 · doi:10.1111/myc.70069

Efficacy and Safety of Efinaconazole 10% Topical Solution for Treatment of Onychomycosis in Older Adults: A Post Hoc Analysis of Two Phase 3 Randomised Trials

2025· article· en· W4410565377 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueMycoses · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNail Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMediprobe Research (Canada)University of Toronto
FundersBausch HealthOrtho Dermatologics
KeywordsMedicinePost-hoc analysisAdverse effectDermatologyClinical endpointPopulationCure rateClinical trialSurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Onychomycosis is common in older adults and can be difficult to treat owing to slower nail growth, increased nail thickness, comorbidities, and concomitant medications. Oral treatments can be complicated by contraindications, drug-drug interactions, and adverse effects. Topical treatments such as efinaconazole 10% solution may be beneficial for treating older adults. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy/safety of efinaconazole 10% solution in adults aged ≥ 65 years with toenail onychomycosis. PATIENTS/METHODS: In two multicenter, double-blind, phase 3 studies (NCT01008033; NCT01007708), patients with mild to moderate toenail onychomycosis were randomised (3:1) to once-daily efinaconazole or vehicle for 48 weeks, with a 4-week follow-up. Pooled data for participants aged ≥ 65 years were analysed post hoc (n = 162 efinaconazole, n = 56 vehicle). The primary endpoint was complete cure (0% involvement of target toenail plus mycologic cure [negative KOH and fungal culture]) at week 52. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were assessed throughout. RESULTS: At week 52, a significantly greater proportion of older adults (aged 65-71 years) achieved complete cure with efinaconazole than vehicle (13.6% vs. 3.6%; p < 0.05). Complete/almost complete cure rate was also significantly greater (≤ 5% involvement and mycologic cure; 19.1% vs. 5.4%; p = 0.01), and over half (59.2%) of participants achieved mycologic cure with efinaconazole versus 12.5% with vehicle (p < 0.001). Treatment-related TEAE rates with efinaconazole were low (6.0%) and similar to the overall study population. CONCLUSIONS: Efinaconazole 10% solution showed similar efficacy/safety in participants aged ≥ 65 years to the overall phase 3 population, despite potential age-related nail changes. These results demonstrate the benefits of efinaconazole in older patients with onychomycosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.406
Threshold uncertainty score0.366

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it