MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410574029 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0324758

Prevalence and factors associated with mother and newborn skin-to-skin contact in Afghanistan

2025· article· en· W4410574029 on OpenAlexaff
Essa Tawfiq, Muhammad Haroon Stanikzai, Massoma Jafari, Zarghoon Tareen, Sayed Ali Shah Alawi, Zainab Ezadi, Abdul Wahed Wasiq, Omid Dadras

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS ONE · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBreastfeeding Practices and Influences
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersUNICEF
KeywordsBreastfeedingMedicineOdds ratioLogistic regressionDemographyOddsCross-sectional studyPediatricsLive birthObstetricsPregnancyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Mother-newborn skin-to-skin contact (SSC) involves placing the naked infant on the mother's bare chest within the first hour of birth and is crucial for thermoregulation, bonding, breastfeeding initiation, and promoting neonatal health. This study examined the prevalence, and factors associated with SSC in Afghanistan. METHODS: Data from the Afghanistan Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS) 2022-23 were used and analysed from ever-married women, aged 15-49 years, who delivered a live infant in the past 2 years. The outcome was SSC, placing the naked infant on the mother's bare chest and initiating breastfeeding within the first hour of birth. Adjusted odds ratios [AOR: (95%CI)] of factors associated with SSC were obtained by a logistic regression model. RESULTS: Of 11,992 women, 32.9% practiced SSC. The likelihood of SSC was greater in women with primary [1.38 (1.14-1.68)] and secondary or higher [1.29 (1.06-1.57)] education, in women who had access to media [1.36 (1.11-1.65)], and those who owned mobile phones [1.27 (1.11-1.45)]. The likelihood of SSC was lower in women who delivered at home [0.26 (0.21-0.33)], those who delivered at private clinics or hospitals [0.50 (0.41-0.61)], and those with cesarean section [0.12 (0.08-0.17)]. Women living in rural areas, and women with deliveries conducted by traditional birth attendants/community healthcare workers and by relatives/others had lower odds of SSC [0.76 (0.63-0.92), 0.37 (0.27-0.53), 0.45 (0.33-0.59), respectively]. CONCLUSION: The low prevalence of SSC in Afghanistan highlights the need for targeted health interventions. Efforts should focus on improving access to public clinics and hospitals, enhancing education, training of healthcare providers, and leveraging media and mobile phone access to promote SSC. Interventions should prioritize rural women and women who have undergone cesarean sections to increase SSC rates and improve neonatal health outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS ONESame topicBreastfeeding Practices and InfluencesFrench-language works237,207