MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410575757 · doi:10.1002/acr2.70052

A Catalog of “Knee Friendly” Aerobic Exercises Developed for Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: An International Patient Survey

2025· article· en· W4410575757 on OpenAlexaff
Mathilde Espe Pedersen, Tanja Schjødt Jørgensen, Thomas Bandholm, Mathias Ried‐Larsen, Cecilie Bartholdy, J. Runhaar, D. Schiphof, Kim L. Bennell, Daniel K. White, Lauren King, Marius Henriksen

Bibliographic record

VenueACR Open Rheumatology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Health and Medical Research CouncilMedical Research CouncilTrygFondenParker Institute for Cancer ImmunotherapyOak Foundation
KeywordsAerobic exerciseOsteoarthritisPhysical therapyMedicineKnee painKnee replacementPhysical medicine and rehabilitationArthroplastyAlternative medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Aerobic exercise is recommended for the management of knee osteoarthritis (OA), but knee pain is often a barrier for participation. Some types of aerobic exercise may be less painful to undertake than others, though little is known about which are the most "knee friendly," that is, unlikely to exacerbate knee pain to an unacceptable level. This study aimed to identify aerobic exercise activities that (1) are knee friendly and (2) meet requirements for targeting cardiovascular health. METHODS: We conducted a three-phase international survey. In phase 1, persons living with knee OA provided descriptions of knee friendly exercise types, defined as activities that would cause shortness of breath and difficulty talking without worsening symptoms to an unacceptable level (cause severe symptoms and/or lasting more than 24 hours). In phase 2, exercise physiologists identified exercise activities meeting requirements for increasing aerobic fitness, which were grouped into broader aerobic exercise activities. In phase 3, participants nominated each aerobic exercise activity for "knee friendliness." RESULTS: In phase 1, 487 respondents (Denmark: 259; the Netherlands: 144; Australia: 57; and North America: 15) provided a total of 1,590 exercise descriptions. In phase 2, 154 exercise activities were identified and grouped into a list of 30 broader aerobic exercise activities. In phase 3, 349 participants (Denmark: 195; the Netherlands: 114; Australia: 32; and North America: 8) nominated indoor biking and water exercise as most knee friendly (82% and 70%, respectively). Participants were predominantly women (60.7%), the mean ± SD age was 68.4 ± 8.81 years, the mean ± SD body mass index was 27.5 ± 5.8, the mean ± SD self-efficacy score was 7.3 ± 3.0 (0-10 scale), the mean ± SD symptom duration was 11.7 ± 9.05 years, and the mean ± SD current knee pain was 4.5 ± 2.2 (0-10 scale). CONCLUSION: A catalog of 30 knee friendly aerobic exercise activities was generated for individuals living with knee OA. The catalog aims to empower individuals living with knee OA, offering suitable aerobic exercise options without exacerbating knee pain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.193
Threshold uncertainty score0.787

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACR Open RheumatologySame topicOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207