MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4410579356 · doi:10.1016/j.ajcnut.2025.05.019

Maternal multiple micronutrient supplementation in rural Pakistan increased some milk micronutrient concentrations, but not infant growth, at three-months postpartum: a randomized controlled trial substudy

2025· article· en· W4410579356 on OpenAlexafffund
Jo‐Anna B Baxter, Yaqub Wasan, Allison I Daniel, Kehkashan Begum, Amjad Hussain, Junaid Iqbal, Susanne Aufreiter, Megan R. Beggs, Lauren Duan, Adrianna Greco, Carolina Huang, Sajid Soofi, Robert Bandsma, Zulfiqar A Bhutta, Deborah L. O’Connor

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Clinical Nutrition · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFolate and B Vitamins Research
Canadian institutionsMount Sinai HospitalCentre for Global Health ResearchUniversity of TorontoHospital for Sick Children
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHospital for Sick ChildrenBill and Melinda Gates Foundation
KeywordsMicronutrientRandomized controlled trialMedicineEnvironmental healthPediatricsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: In Pakistan, maternal micronutrient deficiencies are highly prevalent, and stunting affects 43% of infants by 6-mo postpartum. Human milk composition for some micronutrients can be negatively affected by suboptimal maternal nutrition; however, it is unknown whether this affects infant growth. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to determine whether mothers receiving multiple micronutrient supplements (MMSs) compared with standard of care had 1) greater concentrations of iodine, vitamins A, E, and B12, and folate in their milk at 3-mo postpartum; and 2) improved growth of their offspring. Associations between milk micronutrients and infant growth were also explored. METHODS: This substudy was nested within a district-based, cluster-randomized, controlled trial (MaPPS Trial; 25,477 females) with the primary aim of evaluating whether maternal MMS (preconception: twice-weekly, pregnancy and postpartum: daily, to 6-mo postpartum) compared with the standard of care (preconception: no intervention; pregnancy and postpartum: daily iron and folic acid supplementation, to 6-mo postpartum) in rural Pakistan improved infant birthweight. Substudy mother-infant dyads (n = 186) were recruited if infants were term-born and predominantly or exclusively breastfed. Milk micronutrient concentrations were compared to reference values derived from mother's milk [mother's milk adequacy estimates (MAEs)]. RESULTS: MMS increased milk iodine and vitamin A concentrations, but not vitamins B12 or E, nor folate. Importantly, few milk sample micronutrients in either arm were above existing MAEs. MMS compared to standard of care did not improve infant growth. Independent of allocation, having all 5 milk micronutrients below MAEs was associated with decreased infant length-for-age z-score (β: -0.39, 95% CI: -0.73, -0.04; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In a population with maternal micronutrient deficiencies, providing maternal MMS was not associated with milk micronutrient concentrations above MAEs; however, infants born to mothers with milk below MAEs for all investigated micronutrients appeared to experience poorer growth. Further research is needed to understand longer-term implications, if any. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NUMBER AND WEBSITE: ClinlicalTrials.gov: NCT04451395 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04451395) and NCT03287882 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03287882).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Clinical Nutrition→Same topicFolate and B Vitamins Research→French-language works237,207→