Distinct subtypes of astrocytes selectively regulate specific inhibitory synapses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Astrocyte functional heterogeneity within a given neuronal circuit remains largely undetermined, particularly their role at tripartite synapses. Here, we examine multiple functional characteristics of astrocytes distinguished by their specific spatial relation to inhibitory synapses made on distinct hippocampal CA1 pyramidal cell domains: astrocytes covering the peri-somatic area in stratum pyramidale (SP) receiving input from Parvalbumin interneurons, or the apical dendritic area in stratum radiatum (SR) innervated by inhibitory inputs from Somatostatin interneurons. Whole-cell dye-filling and confocal imaging of SR astrocytes showed a typical bushy organization of processes while those of SP astrocytes were more polarized, indicating astrocyte morphological heterogeneity. In addition, SP astrocytes formed a smaller, yet polarised syncytium and displayed greater input resistance relative to SR astrocytes. The two populations of astrocyte are functionally different as indicated by their intrinsic Ca 2+ signaling properties: SP astrocyte Ca 2+ events had a lower frequency and temporal density, but greater amplitude, relative to SR astrocytes. Using the territorial segregation of inhibitory synapses, we observed that the selective activation using DREADD or blockade with intracellular BAPTA of the two populations of astrocytes regulated inhibitory synapses exclusively in their own syncytial territory. Furthermore, each astrocyte population selectively mediated long-term depression at the respective inhibitory synapses through Ca 2+ -dependent modulation of post-synaptic targets. These results indicate domain-specific regulation of inhibitory synapses by distinct SP and SR astrocyte syncytia. Transcriptional analysis revealed enriched gene expression in SP relative to SR astrocytes, notably for regulation of cell growth and morphology, synaptic function and signaling. Overall, our findings reveal a functional specialization of astrocyte subtypes in the hippocampus, highlighting heterogeneous astrocyte regulation of hippocampal synaptic networks important for learning and memory. Graphical abstract
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".