MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410580116 · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2025.106265

What it means to be marine: Sulfur isotope variability in the historical Chesapeake Bay ecosystem

2025· article· en· W4410580116 on OpenAlexafffund
Eric Guiry, J. Ryan Kenedy, Leah Stricker, Michael Lavin, Paul Szpak

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Archaeological Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicIsotope Analysis in Ecology
Canadian institutionsTrent University
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research CouncilSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFisheries Society of the British Isles
KeywordsChesapeake bayOceanographyEnvironmental scienceEcosystemStable isotope ratioBayMarine ecosystemGeologyEstuaryEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stable sulfur isotope ( δ 34 S) analysis is an important tool for addressing archaeological and ecological questions about diet and mobility. A growing body of work has underscored the value of δ 34 S for tracing food sources linked to specific kinds of aquatic primary production, including saltmarshes, freshwater wetlands, seagrass beds, and benthic microalgal communities. Comparatively little work has investigated δ 34 S variation in other marine vertebrate food webs. This may reflect prevailing assumptions that isotopically homogenous marine sulfates will be the main contributor to consumer δ 34 S in all marine ecosystems. We explore this assumption through δ 34 S, δ 13 C, and δ 15 N analyses of bone collagen from a taxonomically and ecologically broad cross-section of marine fauna from preindustrial contexts at the archaeological site of Jamestown, near the Chesapeake Bay in present-day Virginia. Results for most taxa show δ 34 S values that diverge from those expected based on species’ marine ecologies. Benthic primary production, serving as a vector for sulfide-influenced, low- δ 34 S sulfur entering aquatic food webs, offers the most parsimonious explanation. The ecological diversity represented in these findings, covering a wide range of marine and estuarine habitats, suggests that this phenomenon could be common where benthic algae form an important part of primary production in estuarine and other coastal habitats across the globe. Implications for archaeological and ecological δ 34 S interpretive frameworks are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.299
Threshold uncertainty score0.594

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Archaeological ScienceSame topicIsotope Analysis in EcologyFrench-language works237,207