Cyberchondria in Older Adults and Its Relationship With Cognitive Fusion, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Mental Well-Being: Mediation Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cyberchondria is the compulsive searching for health information online that continues despite harmful effects. It leads to increased health anxiety and lower health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Older adults face higher risks of cyberchondria due to their limited digital literacy skills and more frequent health concerns. However, researchers have not thoroughly studied how cyberchondria affects this age group. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore cyberchondria in the older population and investigate its relationship with cognitive fusion (ie, the tendency to become entangled with thoughts and perceive them as literal truths that dictate behavior), HRQOL, and mental well-being. METHODS: A web-based, cross-sectional survey was conducted in May 2024 with a sample of 638 participants from China aged ≥60 years recruited through the online panel of a survey company. The participants completed questionnaires assessing cyberchondria (using the Cyberchondria Severity Scale-12 [CSS-12]), cognitive fusion, HRQOL, and mental well-being. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to assess the hypothesized mediation model, and standardized estimates and their 95% CIs were calculated for all structural paths. RESULTS: Participants had a mean CSS-12 score of 40 (SD 8.5), suggesting a fairly high level of cyberchondria in this sample. Participants with a higher socioeconomic status tended to report lower levels of cyberchondria. The SEM showed that cyberchondria was positively associated with cognitive fusion (β=0.505, P<.001 for both models) and negatively associated with HRQOL (β=-0.221, P<.001) and mental well-being (β=-0.212, P<.001). The mediation model showed a good fit and demonstrated that cognitive fusion fully mediated the total effect of cyberchondria on HRQOL and mental well-being. CONCLUSIONS: Cyberchondria may be more prominent in older Chinese adults, especially those residing in rural areas and with a lower socioeconomic status. Additionally, cyberchondria can enhance cognitive fusion, contributing to poor HRQOL and mental well-being. Interventions focused on "defusing" cyberchondria-relevant thoughts may help reduce maladaptive behaviors associated with cyberchondria and improve the overall well-being of older populations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".